...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of alternative and complementary medicine: research on paradigm, practice, and policy >A comparison between chiropractic management and pain clinic management for chronic low-back pain in a national health service outpatient clinic.
【24h】

A comparison between chiropractic management and pain clinic management for chronic low-back pain in a national health service outpatient clinic.

机译:全国卫生服务门诊部慢性腰背痛的脊椎治疗与疼痛诊所管理之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes in perception of pain and disability for a group of patients suffering with chronic low-back pain (CLBP) when managed in a hospital by either a regional pain clinic or a chiropractor. DESIGN: The study was a pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: The trial was performed at a National Health Service (NHS) hospital outpatient clinic (pain clinic) in the United Kingdom. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Patients with CLBP (i.e., symptom duration of 12 weeks) referred to a regional pain clinic (outpatient hospital clinic) were assessed and randomized to either chiropractic or pain-clinic management for a period of 8 weeks. The study was pragmatic, allowing for normal treatment protocols to be used. Treatment was administered in an NHS hospital setting. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and Numerical Rating Scale were used to assess changes in perceived disability and pain. Mean values at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 were calculated. The mean differences between week 0 and week 8 were compared across the two treatment groups using Student's t-tests. Ninety-five percent (95%) confidence intervals (CIs) for the differences between groups were calculated. RESULTS: Randomization placed 12 patients in the pain clinic and 18 in the chiropractic group, of which 11 and 16, respectively, completed the trial. At 8 weeks, the mean improvement in RMDQ was 5.5 points greater for the chiropractic group (decrease in disability by 5.9) than for the pain-clinic group (0.36) (95% CI 2.0 points to 9.0 points; p = 0.004). Reduction in mean pain intensity at week 8 was 1.8 points greater for the chiropractic group than for the pain-clinic group (p = 0.023). Conclusions: This study suggests that chiropractic management administered in an NHS setting may be effective for reducing levels of disability and perceived pain during the period of treatment for a subpopulation of patients with CLBP.
机译:目的:比较一组由区域性疼痛诊所或脊医在医院进行治疗的慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者在疼痛和残疾感方面的预后。设计:该研究是一项实用,随机,对照试验。地点:该试验在英国的国家卫生服务(NHS)医院门诊诊所(疼痛诊所)进行。受试者和干预措施:将CLBP患者(症状持续时间> 12周)转介到局部疼痛诊所(门诊医院诊所)进行评估,并将其随机分配至脊骨疗法或疼痛诊所治疗,为期8周。该研究是实用的,允许使用正常的治疗方案。在NHS医院中进行治疗。观察指标:罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)和数字量表用于评估感觉到的残疾和疼痛的变化。计算第0、2、4、6和8周的平均值。使用学生t检验比较了两个治疗组在第0周和第8周之间的平均差异。计算了两组之间差异的百分之九十五(95%)的置信区间(CI)。结果:随机分配使疼痛诊所的12名患者和捏脊组的18名患者完成了试验,其中分别有11名和16名患者完成了该试验。在第8周,脊椎按摩治疗组RMDQ的平均改善为5.5点(残疾减少5.9),而疼痛治疗组为0.36(95%CI 2.0点至9.0点; p = 0.004)。脊椎按摩治疗组第8周的平均疼痛强度降低幅度比疼痛诊所组的平均疼痛强度降低幅度高1.8点(p = 0.023)。结论:这项研究表明,在NHS环境中进行的整脊治疗可能对于减少CLBP患者亚群的治疗期间的残疾水平和感觉到的疼痛有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号