首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology >Acorns and inhalers: the Asthma Clinical Research Network.
【24h】

Acorns and inhalers: the Asthma Clinical Research Network.

机译:橡子和吸入器:哮喘临床研究网络。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the early 1970s, the medicine chest for an asthma physician in the United States was quite bare. A few nonspecific inhaled bronchodilators were available, along with theophylline and systemic steroids. Treatment with inhaled steroids was just coming into common use, but many physicians and most patients were either wary of their use or not convinced of their effectiveness. In 1989, when the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program promulgated the first set of treatment guidelines, the good news was that there were many more therapeutic options. The bad news was that the evidence base on how to use these treatments was small and strongly biased because the majority of the clinical data came from studies conducted by manufacturers. The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines were based mostly on "expert opinion"; what was needed was to expand the evidence base for asthma treatment through rigorous clinical trials.
机译:在1970年代初期,美国一位哮喘医师的药箱很空缺。有几种非特异性吸入性支气管扩张剂,以及茶碱和全身性类固醇。吸入类固醇的治疗才刚刚开始普遍使用,但是许多医生和大多数患者对使用它们持谨慎态度或不相信其有效性。 1989年,美国国家哮喘教育和预防计划发布了第一套治疗指南,好消息是,还有更多的治疗选择。坏消息是,有关如何使用这些疗法的证据很少,而且有很大的偏见,因为大多数临床数据来自制造商进行的研究。国家哮喘教育和预防计划指南主要基于“专家意见”;我们需要通过严格的临床试验来扩大哮喘治疗的证据基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号