...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology >Native Art v 1 and recombinant Art v 1 are able to induce humoral and T cell-mediated in vitro and in vivo responses in mugwort allergy.
【24h】

Native Art v 1 and recombinant Art v 1 are able to induce humoral and T cell-mediated in vitro and in vivo responses in mugwort allergy.

机译:Native Art v 1和重组Art v 1能够在艾蒿过敏中诱导体液和T细胞介导的体外和体内反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Mugwort pollen is an important allergen source in hay fever and pollen-related food allergy. Little is known about the clinical relevance of the major mugwort allergen Art v 1 and its importance in allergy. OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to investigate the allergenicity of mugwort extract compared with the allergenicity of native (n)Art v 1 and recombinant (r)Art v 1, one major allergen of mugwort, in vivo and in vitro. METHODS: Thirty-two patients allergic to mugwort and 10 control subjects were investigated by means of skin prick and nasal provocation testing with different concentrations of mugwort extract, nArt v 1, and rArt v 1. nArt v 1 was purified from aqueous mugwort extract, and rArt v 1 was cloned, expressed in Escherichia coli, and then purified. The in vitro allergenicity was measured by means of ImmunoCAP, ELISA, ELISA-inhibition experiments, and T-cell proliferation assays. RESULTS: nArt v 1 and rArt v 1 were able to elicit positive in vivo and in vitro reactions. The IgE-binding capacity, as determined by means of ELISA, was slightly higher for nArt v 1 than for rArt v 1, and both allergens were able to induce T-cell proliferation in sensitized patients. However, rArt v 1 elicited a reduced response in skin and nasal provocation tests compared with nArt v 1. Compared with mugwort extract, both nArt v 1 and rArt v 1 showed lower sensitivity in patients with mugwort allergy in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Art v 1, either in its native or recombinant form, is able to induce allergic reactions in patients with mugwort allergy. rArt v 1 induced comparable humoral and cell-mediated responses in vitro but showed reduced in vivo allergenicity compared with biochemically purified nArt v 1.
机译:背景:艾蒿花粉是花粉症和与花粉有关的食物过敏的重要过敏原来源。对艾蒿主要变应原Art v 1的临床相关性及其在过敏中的重要性了解甚少。目的:在这项研究中,我们旨在研究艾蒿提取物的致敏性与天然(n)Art v 1和重组(r)Art v 1的致敏性(体内和体外艾蒿的一种主要致敏原)相比。方法:通过皮肤点刺和鼻激发试验,对不同浓度的艾蒿提取物,nArt v 1和rArt v 1的32名对艾蒿过敏的患者和10名对照受试者进行了调查。从艾草水溶液中纯化nArt v 1,克隆rArt v 1,在大肠杆菌中表达,然后纯化。通过ImmunoCAP,ELISA,ELISA抑制实验和T细胞增殖测定法测量了体外变应原性。结果:nArt v 1和rArt v 1能够在体内和体外引起阳性反应。通过ELISA测定,nArt v 1的IgE结合能力略高于rArt v 1,并且两种变应原均能够在致敏患者中诱导T细胞增殖。然而,与nArt v 1相比,rArt v 1在皮肤和鼻腔激发试验中引起的反应减少。与艾蒿提取物相比,nArt v 1和rArt v 1在体内对艾蒿过敏的患者均显示出较低的敏感性。结论:Art v 1,无论是天然形式还是重组形式,都可以在艾蒿过敏患者中诱发过敏反应。 rArt v 1在体外诱导了类似的体液和细胞介导的反应,但与生化纯化的nArt v 1相比,体内变应原性降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号