...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of adhesive dentistry >Does adhesive resin application contribute to resin bond durability on etched and silanized feldspathic ceramic?
【24h】

Does adhesive resin application contribute to resin bond durability on etched and silanized feldspathic ceramic?

机译:粘合剂树脂的应用是否有助于蚀刻和硅烷化的长石陶瓷上的树脂粘合耐久性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of adhesive application and aging on the bond durability of resin cement to etched and silanized feldspathic ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty blocks (6.4 x 6.4 x 4.8 mm) of feldspathic ceramic (Vita VM7) were produced. The ceramic surfaces were conditioned with 10% hydrofluoric acid gel for 60 s and silanized. They were then randomly divided into two groups. While half of the group received no adhesive, in the other half, a layer of adhesive (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus) was applied. Each ceramic block was then placed in its silicone mold with the treated surface exposed. The dual-cured resin cement (Variolink II) was injected into the mold over the treated surface and polymerized. Specimens were sectioned to achieve nontrimmed bar specimens (approximately 12 sticks/block) that were randomly divided into 2 groups: a) non-aged--microtensile bond test immediately after sectioning; b) aged-thermocycling (TC) 12,000 times, 5 degrees C to 55 degrees C, and water storage (50 days). The microtensile bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed: 1 mm/min). The failure types were examined using an optical light microscope and SEM. Bond strength results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: The adhesive application affected the bond strength results significantly (p = 0.0001) (without adhesive > with adhesive). While aging conditions did not reduce the bond strength in the groups that received no adhesive (20 +/- 5.3 MPa non-aged and 21.5 +/- 5.6 aged) (p = 0.1698), it significantly affected the bond strength results of the group with adhesive application (18 +/- 4.4 MPa to 14.4 +/- 4.7 MPa) (p < 0.001). All groups showed mainly mixed type of failures between the ceramic and the resin cement (81% to 100%). The group in which no adhesive was applied presented a higher incidence of cohesive failure of ceramic after aging (18%) than those of the other groups. CONCLUSION: The use of adhesive did not improve resin cement adhesion to the etched and silanized feldspathic ceramic after long-term thermocycling and water storage.
机译:目的:评估胶粘剂的使用和老化对树脂水泥与蚀刻和硅烷化的长石陶瓷的粘结耐久性的影响。材料与方法:生产了二十块(6.4 x 6.4 x 4.8 mm)长石陶瓷(Vita VM7)。陶瓷表面用10%氢氟酸凝胶处理60 s并硅烷化。然后将他们随机分为两组。虽然一半的人没有粘合剂,但另一半则涂了一层粘合剂(Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus)。然后将每个陶瓷块放在其硅树脂模具中,使处理过的表面暴露在外。将双固化树脂胶泥(Variolink II)注入到经过处理的表面上的模具中并进行聚合。将标本切成切片,以得到未修整的条形标本(大约12条/块),将其随机分为2组:a)切片后立即进行非时效-微拉伸试验; b)老化热循环(TC)12,000次,5摄氏度至55摄氏度,以及储水(50天)。在通用试验机(十字头速度:1mm / min)中进行微拉伸粘合强度试验。使用光学显微镜和SEM检查故障类型。使用双向方差分析和Tukey检验(α= 0.05)分析了粘结强度结果。结果:粘合剂的应用显着影响了粘合强度结果(p = 0.0001)(无粘合剂>有粘合剂)。尽管老化条件并未降低未粘接的组的粘接强度(未老化的组为20 +/- 5.3 MPa,未老化的组为21.5 +/- 5.6)(p = 0.1698),但显着影响了该组的粘接强度结果施加粘合剂(18 +/- 4.4 MPa至14.4 +/- 4.7 MPa)(p <0.001)。所有组均显示出陶瓷和树脂水泥之间的混合破坏类型(81%至100%)。与其他组相比,未施加粘合剂的组老化后陶瓷的内聚破坏发生率更高(18%)。结论:在长期热循环和储水后,使用粘合剂并不能改善树脂水泥对经蚀刻和硅烷化的长石质陶瓷的附着力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号