...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Adhesion >Effects of Surface Hydration and Application Method on the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesives to Dentin
【24h】

Effects of Surface Hydration and Application Method on the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesives to Dentin

机译:表面水化和施加方法对自蚀胶黏剂与牙本质粘结强度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The effect of application methods and dentin hydration on the bond strength of three self-etching adhesives (SEA) were evaluated; 195 extracted bovine incisors were used. The buccal surface was ground in order to expose the dentin, which remained 2-mm minimum thickness, measured by a thickness meter through an opening on the lingual surface. Adper Single Bond 2? was used for the control group. The SEA were applied following two modes of application: passive or active and two hydration states of the dentin surface—dry and wet. After light-curing, composite buildups were made using Grandio? composite. The specimens were sectioned and tested with a microtensile bond strength test. The application method and the hydration state resulted in statistical differences (p = 0.000) making the values of active application for μTBS to dentin higher than passive application. The wet surfaces showed higher fiTBS to dentin ratios than dry surfaces. There were no statistical differences in fiTBS among the SEA tested but there were differences regarding to control group.
机译:评估了施涂方法和牙本质水合对三种自蚀刻胶粘剂(SEA)粘结强度的影响;使用195个提取的牛门齿。磨牙颊表面以暴露牙本质,该牙本质保持最小厚度为2mm,通过厚度计通过舌表面上的开口进行测量。阿珀单键2?用于对照组。 SEA的施用方式有两种:被动或主动以及牙本质表面的两种水合状态(干态和湿态)。光固化后,使用Grandio?制造复合材料。综合。将样品切片并用微拉伸粘合强度测试进行测试。施用方法和水合状态导致统计学差异(p = 0.000),从而使μTBS向牙本质的主动施用值高于被动施用。湿表面显示的fiTBS与牙本质的比率高于干表面。在测试的SEA中,fiTBS的差异无统计学意义,但与对照组的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号