首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension >Communication between Participants and Non-participants in Analytical Capacity Building Projects: Management Advice to Family Farms in Benin
【24h】

Communication between Participants and Non-participants in Analytical Capacity Building Projects: Management Advice to Family Farms in Benin

机译:分析能力建设项目中参与者与非参与者之间的交流:贝宁家庭农场的管理建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Approaches to build farmers' analytical capacities are said to trigger wide-ranging changes. This article reports on the communication process between participants and non-participants in one such approach, related to the technical and management skills learned by participants and the changes these participants subsequently made, and the outcomes in terms of non-participants' learning.Design/Methodology/Approach: In this study, we analysed the following: (1) participants' learning and changes in social practices; (2) communication between participants and non-participants regarding technical and management skills and changes in socialpractices; (3) non-participants' learning and changes in social practices. The case study was a management advice to family farm project in three villages in Benin.Findings: Most participants learned management skills, which led them to reassess their objectives and to reduce traditional social practices they now considered unproductive. Even in the case of frequent communication, non-participants found it difficult to learn management skills, which hindered their experiential learning. Non-participants consequently had difficulty understanding why participants changed their social practices such as reduction of their traditional gift giving, leading to limited well-argued discussion about these changes in practices between participants and non-participants.Practical Implications: This study shows that, due to the limited learning process of non-participants communicating with participants, there is a need to design and test approaches to achieve capacity-building while including more participants at a similar cost, and to stimulate explicit discussion at village level about the changes in values and social practices that these approaches may trigger.Originality/Value: The article analyses both participants and non-participants' experiential learning, and looks at the two sides of the interaction between the communication processes and non-participants' learning.
机译:目的:据说建立农民分析能力的方法会引发广泛的变化。本文报告了参与者和非参与者之间通过这种方法进行的交流过程,涉及参与者学习的技术和管理技能以及参与者后来做出的改变,以及非参与者学习的成果。设计/方法/方法:在这项研究中,我们分析了以下内容:(1)参与者的学习和社会实践的变化; (2)参与者与非参与者之间关于技术和管理技能以及社会实践变化的交流; (3)非参与者的学习和社会实践的变化。案例研究是对贝宁三个村庄的家庭农场项目的管理建议。发现:大多数参与者学习了管理技能,这使他们重新评估了目标并减少了他们现在认为没有生产力的传统社会实践。即使在频繁交流的情况下,非参与者也发现难以学习管理技能,这阻碍了他们的体验式学习。因此,非参与者很难理解参与者为何改变他们的社会习惯,例如减少传统的赠与,导致对参与者与非参与者之间的这些习惯变化的有限的有争议的讨论。实际意义:本研究表明,由于由于非参与者与参与者沟通的学习过程有限,因此有必要设计和测试方法,以实现能力建设,同时以相似的成本包括更多参与者,并鼓励在村一级就价值和价值的变化进行明确的讨论。这些方法可能触发的社会实践。原创性/价值:本文分析了参与者和非参与者的体验学习,并探讨了交流过程和非参与者学习之间相互作用的两个方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号