首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Academic Librarianship >Library and Information Science Research in China-A Survey Based Analysis of 10 LIS Educational Institutes
【24h】

Library and Information Science Research in China-A Survey Based Analysis of 10 LIS Educational Institutes

机译:中国图书馆学情报学研究-基于10所LIS教育机构的调查分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper aims to conduct a quantitative evaluation on the achievement, research productivity, and research hotspots of "Library, Information and Archives management" Science schools or departments in China. In this paper, the "LIS" in China is firstly defined. Before evaluation, data are collected from CSSCI (Chinese Social Science Citation Index)-indexed papers and SSCI (Social Science Citation Index)-indexed papers, as well as projects granted by the two authoritative national foundations in China, SSFC (National Social Science Foundation of China) and NSFC (National Natural Science Foundation of China). Then, a bibliometric-based method and a keyword-based method are employed to analyze the collected data from different perspectives, including annual distribution, author productivity, institute productivity and influence. Through the analysis, several conclusions are made: a) collaborative groups exist, though no particular collaboration preference is exhibited. b) Interdisciplinary research promotes the emergence of new disciplines. c) There are four top institutes with outstanding productivity and six hot research topics in the "LIS" study in China. Also, in a five-year period, "LIS" scholars have paid much attention on network technology and its application in this field. Research addressing the view of "information" is much more popular than the ubiquitous conception of "library". d) There still exist some issues in China's LIS research, for example, the unbalanced development of educational institutes, the excessive preference of theoretical research over technical research, etc. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本文旨在对中国的“图书馆,信息和档案管理”科学学院或系的成就,研究生产率和研究热点进行定量评估。本文首先定义了中国的“ LIS”。在评估之前,收集来自CSSCI(中国社会科学引文索引)索引的论文和SSCI(社会科学引文索引)索引的论文,以及由中国两个权威国家基金会SSFC(国家社会科学基金会)资助的项目中国国家自然科学基金委员会)和国家自然科学基金委员会(国家自然科学基金)。然后,基于文献计量学的方法和基于关键字的方法被用来从不同的角度分析收集的数据,包括年度分布,作者生产率,机构生产率和影响力。通过分析,可以得出一些结论:a)存在协作小组,尽管没有表现出特定的协作偏好。 b)跨学科研究促进了新学科的出现。 c)在中国的“ LIS”研究中,有四所顶级研究机构具有出色的生产力和六个热点研究主题。而且,在五年的时间里,“ LIS”学者对网络技术及其在该领域的应用给予了极大的关注。相对于无所不在的“图书馆”概念,针对“信息”观点的研究更受欢迎。 d)中国的LIS研究仍然存在一些问题,例如教育机构的不平衡发展,理论研究相对于技术研究的偏爱等等。(C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号