首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of artificial organs >Sequential convective therapies (SCT): a prospective study on feasibility, safety, adequacy and tolerance of on-line hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration in sequence.
【24h】

Sequential convective therapies (SCT): a prospective study on feasibility, safety, adequacy and tolerance of on-line hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration in sequence.

机译:序贯对流疗法(SCT):对在线血液滤过和血液透析滤过的可行性,安全性,充分性和耐受性进行前瞻性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sequential dialysis techniques (i.e pure ultrafiltration followed by dialysis) have been used in the past, due to their capability to remove large volumes of fluids without inducing hemodynamic instability. The disadvantages of inadequate efficiency and lack of technology lead to the decline of such methods. Hemofiltration (HF) and hemodiafiltration (HDF) are recently being utilized in a greater proportion thanks to on-line fluid preparation systems. Each process (HF and HDF) has its own benefits in the removal of small, medium and high-molecular weight substances and in hemodynamic stability. Sequential convective therapies (SCT) such as hemofiltration-hemodiafiltration in sequence (HF-HDF) may combine the benefits and eliminate the disadvantages of each method and should be studied in order to explore their potential application in modern dialysis. Furthermore they can be easily applied nowadays, due to the development of new sophisticated dialysis machines. In order to evaluate the feasibility, safety, efficiency and tolerance of different SCT methods we studied 3 schedules: SCT1: 1h pre-dilution HF followed by 3h of post-dilution HDF (in the HF mode we lost 25% of the total fluid that had to be removed). SCT2: 1h pre-dilution HF followed by 3h of post-dilution HDF (in the HF mode we lost 50% of the total fluid that had to be removed). SCT3: 2h pre-dilution HF followed by 2h of post-dilution HDF (in the HF mode we lost 50% of the total fluid that had to be removed). We studied 6 chronic hemodialysis patients using the same machine (AK200 ULTRA), with on-line fluid preparation system and the same type of dialyzer (Polyflux 210). SCT schedules were compared to on-line HF, on-line HDF and high flux dialysis performed with the same dialyzers. The treatments resulted safe, easy, feasible and well tolerated with an improved hemodynamic response to high volume convective therapies. Adequacy of treatment was satisfactory in all SCT schedules while middle molecular weight solute clearance and removal resulted higher in treatments with higher convective component. SCT might represent an interesting option for the future especially in patients with hemodynamic instability and requirements for interventions during treatment.
机译:过去已经使用了顺序透析技术(即先进行纯超滤再进行透析),因为它们能够去除大量液体而不会引起血液动力学不稳定。效率不足和技术不足的缺点导致这种方法的下降。借助在线流体制备系统,最近越来越多地使用血液滤过(HF)和血液透析滤过(HDF)。每个过程(HF和HDF)在去除小,中和高分子量物质以及血液动力学稳定性方面都有其自身的优势。顺序对流疗法(SCT),例如顺序血液滤过-血液透析滤过(HF-HDF)可能结合了每种方法的优点,消除了每种方法的缺点,因此应进行研究,以探索其在现代透析中的潜在应用。此外,由于新的先进透析机的发展,它们现在可以很容易地应用。为了评估不同SCT方法的可行性,安全性,效率和耐受性,我们研究了3个时间表:SCT1:HF稀释前1h,然后HDF稀释3h(在HF模式下,我们损失了总液体的25%必须删除)。 SCT2:HF稀释前1h,然后HDF稀释后3h(在HF模式下,我们损失了必须清除的总液体的50%)。 SCT3:HF稀释前2h,然后HDF稀释后2h(在HF模式下,我们损失了必须清除的总液体的50%)。我们使用同一台机器(AK200 ULTRA),在线流体制备系统和同一类型的透析仪(Polyflux 210)研究了6名慢性血液透析患者。将SCT计划与使用相同透析器进行的在线HF,在线HDF和高通量透析进行了比较。这些治疗产生了安全,简便,可行和良好的耐受性,并改善了对大容量对流疗法的血液动力学反应。在所有SCT计划中,处理的充分性均令人满意,而对流成分较高的处理中,中等分子量溶质的清除和去除效果更高。 SCT可能代表着未来的一种有趣的选择,尤其是在血液动力学不稳定且需要在治疗期间进行干预的患者中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号