...
首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of occupational and environmental medicine >Job demand and control interventions: A stakeholder-centered best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews on workplace disability
【24h】

Job demand and control interventions: A stakeholder-centered best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews on workplace disability

机译:工作需求和控制干预措施:以利益相关者为中心的最佳证据综合报告,关于工作场所残疾的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Physical and psychological job demands in combination with the degree of control a worker has over task completion, play an important role in reducing stress. Occupational stress is an important, modifiable factor affecting work disability. However, the effectiveness of reducing job demands or increasing job control remains unclear, particularly for outcomes of interest to employers, such as absenteeism or productivity. Objective: This systematic review reports on job demand and control interventions that impact absenteeism, productivity and financial outcomes. Methods: A stakeholder-centered best-evidence synthesis was conducted with researcher and stakeholder collaboration throughout. Databases and grey literature were searched for systematic reviews between 2000 and 2012: Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DARE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, TRIP, health-evidence.ca, Rehab+, National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC), and Institute for Work and Health. Articles were assessed independently by two researchers for inclusion criteria and methodological quality. Differences were resolved through consensus. Results: The search resulted in 3363 unique titles. After review of abstracts, 115 articles were retained for full-text review. 11 articles finally met the inclusion criteria and are summarized in this synthesis. The best level of evidence we found indicates that multimodal job demand reductions for either at-work or off-work workers will reduce disability-related absenteeism. Conclusion: In general, the impacts of interventions that aim to reduce job demands or increase job control can be positive for the organization in terms of reducing absenteeism, increasing productivity and cost-effectiveness. However, more high quality research is needed to further assess the relationships and quantify effect sizes for the interventions and outcomes reviewed in this study.
机译:背景:身体和心理工作需求与工人对任务完成的控制程度相结合,在减轻压力方面起着重要作用。职业压力是影响工作能力的重要,可改变的因素。但是,减少工作需求或增强工作控制的效果仍不清楚,尤其是对于雇主感兴趣的结果,例如旷工或生产力。目标:这项系统的审查报告了影响缺勤,生产力和财务成果的工作需求和控制干预措施。方法:以研究者和利益相关者的协作为中心,进行了以利益相关者为中心的最佳证据综合。在2000年至2012年之间,检索了数据库和灰色文献以进行系统评价:Medline,EMBASE,Cochrane系统评价数据库,DARE,CINAHL,PsycINFO,TRIP,health-evidence.ca,Rehab +,国家康复信息中心(NARIC)和工作与健康研究所。两名研究人员对文章的纳入标准和方法学质量进行了独立评估。分歧通过协商解决。结果:搜索结果得到3363个唯一标题。在对摘要进行审阅后,保留了115篇文章进行全文审阅。最终有11篇文章符合纳入标准,并在此综述中进行了总结。我们发现的最佳证据表明,减少上班或下班工人的多式联运需求将减少与残疾相关的旷工。结论:总体而言,旨在减少工作需求或加强工作控制的干预措施所产生的影响,对于减少缺勤,提高生产率和成本效益而言,对组织可能是积极的。但是,需要进行更多高质量的研究,以进一步评估关系,并量化本研究中评估的干预措施和结果的疗效大小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号