首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology >Climate change, risk management and the end of Nomadic pastoralism
【24h】

Climate change, risk management and the end of Nomadic pastoralism

机译:气候变化,风险管理与游牧民族的终结

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mobility has been argued to be the single factor explaining why some pastoralists do relatively well during extreme climatic events, while others do not, because mobility works by taking advantage of the spatial and temporal structure of resource failure by moving away from scarcity towards abundance. In spite of this, a common governmental management strategy is to resettle pastoral populations and thereby significantly reduce mobility. By revealing the underlying logic of mobility for Tibetan pastoralists, this paper questions official policy that aims at privatizing communally owned rangelands since it reduces pastoral flexibility and access to key resources. This is especially pertinent in the face of climate change. While little is known as to the specifics of how climate change will affect nomadic pastoralists, environmental variability is likely to increase. Consequently, policies resulting in decreased mobility may exacerbate the negative effects of climate change because of a positive feedback between climate and negative density dependence.
机译:有人认为,流动性是解释为什么某些牧民在极端气候事件中表现相对较好而其他人则不这样做的唯一因素,因为流动性是通过利用资源衰竭的时空结构,从稀缺性转向富裕而发挥作用的。尽管如此,一种常见的政府管理策略是重新安置牧民,从而显着减少流动性。通过揭示藏族牧民流动的潜在逻辑,本文质疑旨在私有化牧场的私有化的官方政策,因为它降低了牧民的灵活性和对关键资源的获取。面对气候变化,这一点尤其重要。尽管人们对气候变化如何影响游牧民族的细节知之甚少,但环境变异性可能会增加。因此,由于气候变化和负密度依赖之间的正反馈,导致流动性下降的政策可能加剧气候变化的负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号