首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of urology >Ureteroileal anastomotic strictures after a Bricker ileal conduit: 50 case assessment of the impact of conversion from a slit incision to a 'shield shaped' ileotomy.
【24h】

Ureteroileal anastomotic strictures after a Bricker ileal conduit: 50 case assessment of the impact of conversion from a slit incision to a 'shield shaped' ileotomy.

机译:使用Bricker回肠导管后输尿管上吻合口狭窄:50例评估从狭缝切口转换为“盾形”回肠切开术的影响的病例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Ureteroileal anastomotic stricture is a late complication of Bricker ileal conduits. We report our utilization of a "shield shaped" rather than a standard slit ileotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a single surgeon's experience performing Bricker ileal conduits, initially using a slit incision, then a shield shaped ileotomy. Patient demographics, type of ileotomy, indication, history of prior radiation or chemotherapy, development of postoperative ureteroileal anastomotic stricture, date of stricture diagnosis, imaging modality, stricture treatment, outcome, and length of follow up were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 50 ileal conduit patients were identified between 2001-2009. A traditional slit incision ileotomy was performed in 25 patients (Group 1) and a shield shaped ileotomy was performed in the following 25 (Group 2). After excluding 1 patient in each group that died within 90 days postoperatively, a total of 95 renal units were anastomosed, (Group 1: 24 patients, 48 renal units, 2001-2005; and Group 2: 24 patients, 47 renal units, 2006-2009). A total of 8 (8.3%) ureteroileal anastomotic strictures were identified: 6 (12.5%) in Group 1, including 1 with bilateral strictures, and 2 (4.3%) in Group 2. Stricture diagnosis occurred at 1, 4, 4, 5, 14 and 42 months in Group 1, and at 6 and 10 months in Group 2. Mean follow up was 24.2 (2-85) months and 12.3 (2-26) months for each cohort, respectively. No increase in postoperative anastomotic leakage was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Modifying the standard ileotomy slit to a shield shaped incision does not eliminate postoperative anastomotic strictures. This technique provides greater visualization of the suture line, making it technically easier to perform.
机译:目的:输尿管上吻合口狭窄是Bricker回肠导管的晚期并发症。我们报告了我们使用“盾形”而不是标准的狭缝回肠切开术。材料与方法:我们回顾性地回顾了一位外科医生执行Bricker回肠导管的经验,首先使用狭缝切口,然后使用盾形回肠切开术。记录患者的人口统计资料,回肠切开术的类型,适应症,既往放疗或化疗史,术后输尿管油吻合狭窄的发生,狭窄诊断的日期,影像学方式,狭窄治疗,结局和随访时间。结果:2001年至2009年之间共确定了50例回肠导管患者。 25例患者进行了传统的切口切口回肠切开术(组1),随后25例进行了盾形回肠切开术(组2)。在排除每组在术后90天内死亡的患者后,对总共95个肾单位进行吻合(第1组:24位患者,48个肾单位,2001-2005;第2组:24位患者,47个肾单位,2006年-2009)。总共确定了8个(8.3%)输尿管吻合口狭窄:第1组中有6个(12.5%),包括双侧狭窄中的1个,第2组中有2个(4.3%)。严格的诊断发生在1,4,4,5第1组分别为14和42个月,第2组分别为6和10个月。每个队列的平均随访时间分别为24.2(2-85)个月和12.3(2-26)个月。术后未发现吻合口漏增加。结论:将标准回肠切开术切口改成盾形切口不能消除术后吻合口狭窄。这项技术可以更好地显示缝合线,从而在技术上更易于执行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号