【24h】

Resolving confusion

机译:解决混乱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the fourth article in his series, Brent Elliott examines the effects of floral dissection and new taxonomic systems in the early 18th century. AS WE have seen in previous articles, botanical illustration reached, what might have seemed, its peak ofachievement with the work of Nicolas Robert in the 17th century. But while it might not have been possible for botanical art to improve, it could still be developed in new directions, and the major innovation of the next generation was to find ways of adapting it to the purposes of the emergent discipline of plant taxonomy. The Comte de Mouton-Fontenille published a little-known, but very useful, work entitled Tableau des ssstemes de botanique, in 1798, in which he compared 49 different systems of plant classification that had been proposed by his day. The details of these systems are now of interest only to historians; the point is their proliferation -- the sheer number of conflicting ways of classifying plants that grew up in the late 17th and 18th centuries.
机译:布伦特·埃利奥特(Brent Elliott)在其系列的第四篇文章中考察了18世纪初期花卉解剖和新分类系统的影响。正如我们在前几篇文章中所见,植物学插图达到了,似乎是17世纪尼古拉斯·罗伯特(Nicolas Robert)的成就达到顶峰的时候。但是,尽管植物技术可能无法进行改进,但仍可以朝着新的方向发展,而下一代的主要创新是找到使之适应植物分类学新兴学科目的的方法。 1798年,木桐-枫丹尼尔孔德发表了鲜为人知但非常有用的作品《植物学的Tableau des ssstemes de botanique》,他比较了当时提出的49种不同的植物分类系统。现在,这些系统的细节仅对历史学家有意义。关键是它们的扩散-在17和18世纪后期生长的植物分类方法的数量之多相互矛盾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号