【24h】

Authors' response

机译:作者的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We thank the authors for their interest in our article and valuable comments. First, Dr Leach disagrees with the 2-week interval for repeating HbA1c to confirm new diagnosis of diabetes in asymptomatic people with HbA1c >=6.5% (>=48 mmol/ mol). Dr Leach suggests instead a longer interval of 6-8 weeks for the test is more appropriate. However we disagree with Dr Leach's suggestion. First, HbA1c already gives reflection of level of glycaemia over a period of a few weeks compared to glucose test that gives a snapshot of glycaemia at that point in time. Therefore the main idea behind repeating the HbA1c test is to rule out any lab errors in HbA1c measurement. The suggested 2-week interval is arbitrary taking into consideration any logistics of repeating the test after the first test in the primary care setting. Additionally repeating the test within 2 weeks (not after 2 weeks) preclude the possibility of a patient introducing an intervention (for example, increasing physical activity or lowering dietary glucose load) to decrease his/her glucose profile thereby affecting results of the repeat HbA1c test. Fifty per cent of the contribution to HbA1c comes from the preceding 4- weeks and therefore any longer interval would risk a change in the HbA1c result.
机译:感谢作者对我们的文章和有价值的评论感兴趣。首先,利奇博士不同意重复两次HbA1c的间隔以证实HbA1c> = 6.5%(> = 48 mmol / mol)的无症状患者的新诊断。 Leach博士建议,更合适的间隔时间为6-8周。但是,我们不同意Leach博士的建议。首先,与葡萄糖测试相比,HbA1c已经在几周的时间内反映出了血糖水平,而葡萄糖测试可以及时反映当时的血糖水平。因此,重复进行HbA1c测试的主要思想是排除HbA1c测量中的任何实验室错误。建议的2周间隔是任意的,考虑到在基层医疗机构中进行第一次检查后重复检查的任何后勤措施。此外,在2周内(而不是2周后)重复测试会排除患者采取干预措施(例如,增加体力活动或降低饮食中的葡萄糖负荷)以降低其葡萄糖状况从而影响重复HbA1c测试结果的可能性。 。对HbA1c的贡献中有50%来自之前的4周,因此任何更长的间隔都可能会导致HbA1c结果发生变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号