【24h】

An A-Z of medical philosophy

机译:医学哲学的AZ

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OK, every tribe likes to reserve some language for its own use and polish up a few long words to keep the barbarians at bay. Philosophers are no different, but not as bad as medics. 'Ontology' is the study of what types or categories of things might reasonably be thought to exist in the world itself as opposed to just our imagined ways of thinking about things. Talking about planks of wood and body tissue is easy - they seem to exist in the world as it is in itself - we can cut them, we can measure them, we notice when they go wrong. But what about right' or wrong'? Are they real categories in the world? They are certainly not real categories in the world of matter but neither is the experience of seeing the colour red - it exists within our mind only but is no less real for that. Might right and wrong be real categories in the human world, which is part of the whole world, or do we just invent them as we talk?
机译:好的,每个部落都喜欢保留一些语言供自己使用,并打磨一些长字以防野蛮人。哲学家没有什么不同,但没有军医那么糟糕。 “本体论”是对事物的类型或类别可能被合理地认为存在于世界本身的研究,而不是我们想象的事物思考方式。谈论木板和人体组织很容易-它们似乎本身就存在于世界上-我们可以切割它们,可以测量它们,并注意到它们出了错。但是对与错呢?它们是世界上的真实类别吗?它们在物质世界中当然不是真正的类别,但是看到红色的经历也不是-它仅存在于我们的脑海中,但同样不那么真实。对与错在人类世界中可能是真实的范畴,而人类世界是整个世界的一部分,还是我们在谈话时才发明它们?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号