...
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Are pharmacy-based minor ailment schemes a substitute for other service providers? A systematic review
【24h】

Are pharmacy-based minor ailment schemes a substitute for other service providers? A systematic review

机译:以药房为基础的小疾病计划是否可以替代其他服务提供商?系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Minor ailments are defined as common or self-Limiting or uncomplicated conditions that can be diagnosed and managed without medical intervention. Up to 18% of general practice workload is estimated to relate to minor ailments, at a cost of £2 billion annually to the NHS. In the UK, pharmacy-based minor ailment schemes (PMASs) provide public access to NHS treatment and/or advice via pharmacist or pharmacy personnel, or, where appropriate, to onward referral to other health professionals. A systematic review was conducted to explore the effect of PMASs on patient health- and cost-related outcomes. The review also aimed to quantify the extent to which existing PMASs have achieved the aim of shifting demand from high-cost services.
机译:轻度疾病定义为可以在无需医疗干预的情况下进行诊断和管理的常见或自我限制或简单的疾病。据估计,多达18%的全科医疗工作量与小疾病有关,每年给NHS造成20亿英镑的损失。在英国,以药房为基础的小疾病计划(PMAS)通过药师或药房人员,或者在适当情况下,转介给其他卫生专业人员,使公众能够获得NHS治疗和/或建议。进行了系统的审查,以探讨PMAS对患者健康和费用相关结局的影响。审查还旨在量化现有PMAS在多大程度上实现了将需求从高成本服务中转移出来的目标。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号