首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of cardiology >Left atrial appendage occlusion study II (LAAOS II)
【24h】

Left atrial appendage occlusion study II (LAAOS II)

机译:左心耳阻塞研究II(LAAOS II)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is a potential alternative to anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, evidence of its safety and efficacy is lacking. The Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study II (LAAOS II) explored the feasibility of a definitive trial of LAA occlusion for stroke prevention in AF. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 1889 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery was performed to determine the prevalence of AF and risk factors for stroke. We also randomized 51 patients with AF and increased stroke risk to LAA occlusion (n= 26) or no occlusion and oral anticoagulation (n= 25) to assess the rate of recruitment and the safety of LAA amputation. Results: In the cross-sectional study, 204 patients (10.8%) had AF and 98 (5.2%) met trial eligibility. Fifty-one patients were recruited into the trial at a rate of 1.6 patients per centre per month. No patient with occlusion had significant bleeding at the LAA site. At 1 year, 4 patients (15.4%) in the occlusion arm and 5 patients (20.0%) in the no-occlusion arm experienced death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, noncerebral systemic emboli, or major bleeding (relative risk [RR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-2.66; P= 0.61). The predominant component of the composite was stroke, with 1 in the occlusion arm and 3 in the no-occlusion arm. Conclusions: LAA occlusion can be safely performed at the time of cardiac surgery. A large trial to evaluate the clinical efficacy of LAA occlusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is possible in motivated centres with some modifications to the design of LAAOS II.
机译:背景:对于房颤(AF)患者,左心耳(LAA)的阻塞是抗凝治疗的潜在替代方法。但是,缺乏其安全性和有效性的证据。左心耳阑尾阻塞研究II(LAAOS II)探索了LAA阻塞明确试验预防房颤的可行性。方法:进行了一项横断面研究,对1889名连续进行心脏手术的患者进行了研究,以确定房颤的患病率和中风的危险因素。我们还随机抽取了51名患有AF且LAA闭塞(n = 26)或无闭塞和口服抗凝治疗(n = 25)的卒中风险增加的患者,以评估招募率和LAA截肢的安全性。结果:在横断面研究中,有204名患者(10.8%)患有房颤,其中98名(5.2%)符合试验资格。以每个中心每月1.6名患者的速度招募了51名患者参加该试验。没有阻塞的患者在LAA部位有明显的出血。在1年时,阻塞组有4例患者(15.4%),无阻塞组有5例患者(20.0%)经历了死亡,心肌梗塞(MI),中风,非脑系统性栓塞或大出血(相对危险度[RR ; 0.71; 95%置信区间[CI],0.19-2.66; P = 0.61)。复合材料的主要成分是中风,在闭塞臂中占1个,在非闭塞臂中占3个。结论:心脏手术时可以安全地进行LAA闭塞。在动机中心对LAAOS II的设计进行一些修改,可以在动机中心进行一项大型试验来评估LAA闭塞在接受心脏手术的患者中的临床疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号