...
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of cardiology >Incremental shuttle and six-minute walking tests in the assessment of functional capacity in chronic heart failure.
【24h】

Incremental shuttle and six-minute walking tests in the assessment of functional capacity in chronic heart failure.

机译:增量穿梭和六分钟步行测试可评估慢性心力衰竭的功能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The incremental shuttle test presents some theoretical advantages over the six-minute walk test in chronic heart failure (CHF), including better standardization and less dependency on collaboration. OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated test-retest repeatability, test accuracy in predicting a peak oxygen consumption (VO(2)) of 14 mL/kg/min or less, as well as the prognostic value of both walking tests in stable CHF patients. METHODS: Sixty-three patients (44 men; New York Heart Association functional class II to IV) underwent an incremental treadmill exercise test and, on another day, the walk test in duplicate. RESULTS: Patients showed well-preserved functional capacity according to the distance walked in both tests (six-minute walk test 491+/-94 m versus incremental shuttle walk test 422+/-119 m; P<0.001). Interestingly, the six-minute and incremental shuttle walk test differences in distance walked were higher in more disabled patients. The mean bias +/-95% CI of the within-test differences were similar (7+/-40 m and 8+/-45 m, respectively). Peak VO(2), but not distance walked in either test, was associated with survival (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The incremental shuttle walk test showed similar repeatability and accuracy in estimating peak VO(2) compared with the six-minute walk test in CHF patients. Direct measurement of peak VO(2), however, remains superior to either walking test in predicting survival--at least in patients with well-preserved functional capacity.
机译:背景:在慢性心力衰竭(CHF)中,增量穿梭试验比六分钟步行试验具有一些理论优势,包括更好的标准化和对协作的依赖性。目的:本研究评估了重测的可重复性,预测峰值耗氧量(VO(2))为14 mL / kg / min或更低的测试准确性,以及两次步行测试对稳定CHF患者的预后价值。方法:63例患者(44名男性;纽约心脏协会功能性II至IV级)进行了增量跑步机运动测试,第二天又进行了一次步行测试。结果:根据两项测试中的步行距离,患者均表现出良好的功能能力(六分钟步行测试491 +/- 94 m,而增量穿梭步行测试为422 +/- 119 m; P <0.001)。有趣的是,更多的残疾患者在步行距离上的六分钟和增量穿梭步行测试差异更高。测试内差异的平均偏差+/- 95%CI相似(分别为7 +/- 40 m和8 +/- 45 m)。峰值VO(2)与生存率相关(P <0.05),但在任一测试中均无行走距离。结论:与CHF患者六分钟步行测试相比,增量穿梭步行测试在估计峰值VO(2)方面显示出相似的可重复性和准确性。但是,直接测量VO(2)峰值在预测生存率方面仍然优于任一步行测试-至少在功能完好的患者中如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号