首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of cardiology >Frailty and outcome in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome
【24h】

Frailty and outcome in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome

机译:老年急性冠脉综合征患者的虚弱和预后

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Frailty is superior to chronological age as a predictor of outcome. The Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) is a simple valid measure of frailty, covering multiple important domains, with scores ranging from 0 (not frail) to 17 (very frail). The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the EFS in a group of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: The EFS was administered to 183 consecutive patients with ACS aged ≥ 65 years admitted to a single centre in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Results: Scores ranged from 0-13. Patients with higher EFS scores were older, with more comorbidities, longer lengths of stay (EFS 0-3: mean, 7.0 days; EFS 4-6: mean, 9.7 days; and EFS ≥ 7: mean, 12.7 days; P= 0.03), and decreased procedure use. Crude mortality rates at 1 year were 1.6% for EFS 0-3, 7.7% for EFS 4-6, and 12.7% for EFS ≥ 7 (P= 0.05). After adjusting for baseline risk differences using a "burden of illness" score, the hazard ratio for mortality for EFS ≥ 7 compared with EFS 0-3 was 3.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-7.61; P= 0.002). Conclusions: The EFS is associated with increased comorbidity, longer lengths of stay, and decreased procedure use. After adjustment forburden of illness, the highest frailty category is independently associated with mortality in elderly patients with ACS. Further work is needed to determine whether the use of a validated frailty instrument would better delineate medical decision making in this important, often disadvantaged population.
机译:背景:衰弱比预后年龄更能预测结果。埃德蒙顿脆弱量表(EFS)是衡量脆弱性的简单有效方法,涵盖多个重要领域,得分范围从0(不脆弱)到17(非常脆弱)。这项初步研究的目的是评估一组急性冠脉综合征(ACS)老年患者的EFS。方法:在加拿大艾伯塔省埃德蒙顿市的一个中心接受连续183例年龄≥65岁的ACS患者进行EFS治疗。结果:分数范围为0-13。 EFS评分较高的患者年龄较大,合并症更多,住院时间更长(EFS 0-3:平均7.0天; EFS 4-6:平均9.7天; EFS≥7:平均12.7天; P = 0.03 ),并减少了程序的使用。 EFS 0-3的1年粗死亡率为1.6%,EFS 4-6的为7.7%,EFS≥7的为12.7%(P = 0.05)。在使用“疾病负担”评分调整基线风险差异后,EFS≥7的死亡率与EFS 0-3的死亡率的危险比为3.49(95%置信区间[CI],1.08-7.61; P = 0.002)。结论:EFS与合并症增加,住院时间更长和手术使用减少有关。在调整疾病负担后,最脆弱的类别与ACS老年患者的死亡率独立相关。需要做进一步的工作以确定使用经过验证的脆弱仪器是否能更好地描述这一重要的,往往处于不利地位的人群的医疗决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号