...
首页> 外文期刊>The Ecologist: Journal of the Post Industrial Age >Sir David King: The man who changed the world... but can he save it?
【24h】

Sir David King: The man who changed the world... but can he save it?

机译:大卫·金爵士(Sir David King):改变世界的人……但他能拯救世界吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sir David King has been Chief Scientific Adviser to the British Government since 2000. In 2002 he changed the world when he declared 'climate change is a greater threat to civilisation than terrorism'. At a stroke, the threat of climate change startedto be taken seriously by all but President George Bush. Latterly he played a substantive role in the writing of the Stern Review on The Economic Impact of Climate Change, which has debunked the economic argument against taking action, to avert what SirDavid now describes as potential climate catastrophe. So Sir David is a man who undoubtedly takes climate change seriously and is keeping it high on the political agenda, at home and abroad. But on the face of it there are inherent contradictions in SirDavid's role. How does fact-based science and politics mix. and how does wealth creation and science mix? These potential conflicts were highlighted late last year when the government gave the go-ahead for trials of genetically modified potato crops in the UK. Had the science, wealth creation possibilities or politics - or a combination of the three - led to the decision that flies in the face of public opposition? Similarly, aiming for a 60 per cent cut in greenhouse gas emissions when a great many climate scientists are saying an 85 per cent cut is required to avoid genocide in Africa smacks of political pragmatism, too, rather than science. We had 30 minutes to discuss these issues when we met at Sir David's office within the Department of Trade and Industry in December, 2006.
机译:David King爵士自2000年以来一直担任英国政府的首席科学顾问。2002年,他宣布“气候变化比恐怖主义对文明的更大威胁”改变了世界。乔治·布什总统以外的所有人都开始认真对待气候变化的威胁。他后来在《关于气候变化的经济影响的斯特恩评论》(Stern Review)中扮演了实质性角色,该评论揭穿了不采取行动的经济论点,以避免爵士现在描述为潜在的气候灾难。因此,大卫爵士无疑是一个认真对待气候变化的人,并将其放在国内外的政治议程中。但是从表面上看,大卫爵士的角色存在内在矛盾。基于事实的科学与政治如何融合。财富创造和科学如何融合?去年年底,当政府批准在英国进行转基因马铃薯作物的试验时,这些潜在的冲突得到了强调。科学,创造财富的可能性或政治-或三者的结合-导致面对公众反对的决定成真了吗?同样,当许多气候科学家表示,为了避免非洲发生种族灭绝而不是出于政治实用主义而不是出于科学目的时,就要求将温室气体排放减少60%。 2006年12月,我们在贸易和工业部戴维爵士的办公室开会时,我们有30分钟的时间讨论这些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号