...
首页> 外文期刊>Chest: The Journal of Circulation, Respiration and Related Systems >Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness in the Assessment of Asthma Control Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Asthma: Its Measurement and Clinical Significance
【24h】

Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness in the Assessment of Asthma Control Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Asthma: Its Measurement and Clinical Significance

机译:哮喘支气管高反应性评估哮喘控制气道高反应性:其测量和临床意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The two key pathophysiologic features of asthma are bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation. Symptoms and lung function are the most accessible clinical markers for the diagnosis of asthma as well as for assessing asthma control using the most effective treatment of asthma, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). However, BHR and inflammation usually take longer to resolve using ICS compared with symptoms and lung function. BHR can be assessed using "direct" stimuli that act on the airway smooth muscle (eg, methacholine) or "indirect" stimuli that require the presence of airway inflammation (eg, exercise, osmotic stimuli). Although there are practical limitations in using BHR to assess asthma control, efforts have been made to make BHR more accessible and standardized. Some studies have demonstrated that treatment aimed to decrease BHR with direct stimuli can lead to improved asthma control; however, it often results in the use of higher doses of ICS. Furthermore, BHR to direct stimuli does not usually resolve using ICS because of a fixed component. By contrast, BHR with an indirect stimulus indicates a responsive smooth muscle that occurs only in the presence of inflammation sensitive to ICS (eg, mast cells, eosinophils). BHR to indirect stimuli does resolve using ICS. Because ICS target both key pathophysiologic features of asthma, assessing indirect BHR in the presence of ICS will identify resolution or persistence of BHR and airway inflammation. This may provide a more clinically relevant marker for asthma control that may also lead to improving the clinical usefulness of ICS.
机译:哮喘的两个关键病理生理特征是支气管高反应性(BHR)和气道炎症。症状和肺功能是使用哮喘最有效的治疗方法,即吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)进行哮喘诊断和评估哮喘控制的最容易获得的临床指标。但是,与症状和肺功能相比,使用ICS解决BHR和炎症通常需要更长的时间。可以使用作用在气道平滑肌上的“直接”刺激(例如,乙酰甲胆碱)或需要气道炎症存在的“间接”刺激(例如,运动,渗透刺激)来评估BHR。尽管使用BHR评估哮喘控制存在实际局限性,但已努力使BHR更加易于访问和标准化。一些研究表明,旨在通过直接刺激降低BHR的治疗可以改善哮喘控制。但是,这通常导致使用更高剂量的ICS。此外,由于成分固定,通常无法使用ICS来解决BHR指导刺激的问题。相比之下,具有间接刺激的BHR表示仅在对ICS敏感的炎症(例如肥大细胞,嗜酸性粒细胞)存在的情况下出现的反应性平滑肌。间接刺激的BHR确实使用ICS解决。由于ICS的目标是哮喘的两个关键病理生理特征,因此在ICS存在下评估间接BHR将确定BHR的缓解或持续性以及气道炎症。这可能为哮喘控制提供了更临床相关的标志,也可能导致ICS的临床实用性的提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号