...
首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of general practice. >Obtaining the family history for common, multifactorial diseases by family physicians. A descriptive systematic review.
【24h】

Obtaining the family history for common, multifactorial diseases by family physicians. A descriptive systematic review.

机译:由家庭医生获取常见的多因素疾病的家族病史。描述性的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the knowledge on the use of comprehensive family history taking for common, multifactorial diseases in primary health care. DESIGN AND DATA SOURCES: Systematic review of MEDLINE (1966-2008), EMBASE (1986-2008) and Cochrane Library. Methods: Search terms reflected 'primary care', 'family history' and 'genetics'. Included were original studies, published in the English language, from a primary care setting, investigating family history taking for multifactorial disorders. Methodological criteria (design, size, response rate) were not used to exclude papers. Out of 116 potentially eligible papers, 27 papers were selected: nine studies on opinions, eight studies on actual practice, seven studies on family history tools, and three studies on the patient perspective. Two authors independently extracted the data, and consequently discussed and summarized them. Given the heterogeneity of the studies, outcomes were presented in a qualitative way. RESULTS: Among family physicians, the general opinion was that taking a family history is the task of the primary care physician. However, observational studies of consultations and analyses of medical records showed wide variability and low regular updating. There are no family history tools yet, that are sufficiently feasible and reproducible. Patients and doctors may perceive a positive family history differently, which may cause miscommunication. CONCLUSION: There is a need for research into feasible and high quality tools for detailed family history taking for multifactorial disorders.
机译:目的:总结关于综合家庭史用于初级保健中常见的多因素疾病的知识。设计和数据来源:MEDLINE(1966-2008),EMBASE(1986-2008)和Cochrane图书馆的系统评价。方法:搜索词反映“初级保健”,“家族史”和“遗传学”。包括原始研究,这些研究以英文发布,来自基层医疗机构,调查多因素疾病的家族史。方法学标准(设计,尺寸,回复率)未用于排除论文。在116篇可能合格的论文中,选择了27篇论文:9篇关于观点的研究,8篇关于实际实践的研究,7篇关于家族史工具的研究以及3篇关于患者观点的研究。两位作者独立提取了数据,然后进行了讨论和总结。鉴于研究的异质性,结果以定性的方式提出。结果:在家庭医生中,普遍认为接受家族史是初级保健医生的任务。但是,对咨询和医疗记录分析的观察性研究显示变异性很大,定期更新较少。尚无足够可行和可再现的家族史工具。患者和医生对阳性家族史的理解可能有所不同,这可能导致沟通不畅。结论:有必要研究可行的高质量工具,以详细记录家族病因多因素疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号