...
首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Surgery >Randomized controlled trial of ultrasonic dissection versus standard surgical technique in open left hemicolectomy or total gastrectomy (Br J Surg 2011; 98: 220-227).
【24h】

Randomized controlled trial of ultrasonic dissection versus standard surgical technique in open left hemicolectomy or total gastrectomy (Br J Surg 2011; 98: 220-227).

机译:超声解剖与标准手术技术在开放左半结肠切除术或全胃切除术中的随机对照试验(Br J Surg 2011; 98:220-227)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We read with interest the recent randomized controlled trial by Wilhelm and colleagues on ultrasonic dissection verms standard surgical technique in open surgery. However, the article omits important information on the standardization of the two chosen treatments (left hemicolectomy and total gastrectomy). The patients were recruited from three centres in two different countries and were operated on by an unknown number of surgeons, with inevitably variable postoperative regimens. Specifically, use of an enhanced recovery protocol and the availability or reason why laparoscopic surgery was not undertaken is not mentioned. Despite this, a significant proportion of the results section analyses factors such as postoperative pain and return of bowel movements.
机译:我们感兴趣地阅读了Wilhelm及其同事最近在开放手术中对超声解剖切缘标准手术技术进行的随机对照试验。但是,该文章省略了有关两种选定疗法(左半结肠切除术和全胃切除术)标准化的重要信息。这些患者是从两个不同国家的三个中心招募来的,并由不明数目的外科医生进行手术,不可避免地要采用不同的术后治疗方案。具体而言,未提及使用增强的恢复方案以及未进行腹腔镜手术的可用性或原因。尽管如此,结果部分的很大一部分仍在分析诸如术后疼痛和肠蠕动恢复等因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号