【24h】

Authors' reply

机译:作者的回信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We agree that several of the points raised by Nebhinani merit consideration. Indeed, many are discussed in detail in our paper. However, we further elaborate on some of them below. First, Nebhinani noted that the suicides reported in the study might not be accurate figures. We direct readers to the second paragraph of our method section, where we discuss the accuracy of our mortality data. We also direct readers to several studies that show that the National Death Index, our data source for mortality information, is highly accurate, with sensitivity and specificity nearing or exceeding 99%.
机译:我们同意,Nebhinani提出的几点观点值得考虑。确实,我们的论文中有许多详细讨论。但是,我们在下面进一步详细说明。首先,Nebhinani指出,该研究报告的自杀人数可能不是准确的数字。我们将读者引向我们的方法部分的第二段,在此处讨论死亡率数据的准确性。我们还指导读者进行多项研究,这些研究表明,我们的死亡率信息数据来源国家死亡指数非常准确,敏感性和特异性接近或超过99%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号