首页> 外文期刊>Telemedicine and e-health: the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association >Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application
【24h】

Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application

机译:使用随机方法的视敏度应用程序进行视敏度测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: A visual acuity (VA) testing application for the iPad((R)) (Apple, Cupertino, CA) tablet computer using the mirroring technique was developed that randomly presented letters categorized by cognoscibility. The aim of this study was to assess whether measurements of distance VA using this application were in agreement with existing standard clinical tests of VA in adults with normal vision. Materials and Methods: Forty-three normally sighted subjects were tested using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. The log minutes of arc (logMAR) VA results were compared with those from the iPad-based application, which contains a Snellen chart, a Tumbling E chart, a Landolt C chart, and a VA chart consisting of Arabic figures. After a 10-min break, subjects were retested with each test in the same order. Agreement was assessed by determining the 95% limits of agreement +/- 1.96 standard deviation of the differences between tests. Results: The logMAR VA showed no significant difference between the ETDRS chart and the iPad Snellen chart (p = 0.66) and iPad Arabic figure chart (p = 0.29). The logMAR VA of the ETDRS chart was significantly better than that of the iPad Tumbling E chart (p < 0.01) or iPad Landolt C chart (p < 0.01). The subjects showed chart letter memory of the ETDRS chart (p < 0.05), Tumbling E chart (p = 0.03), and Landolt C chart (p = 0.001) but not of the iPad Snellen chart (p = 0.62) and iPad Arabic figure chart (p = 0.12). Conclusions: The iPad-based application of VA charts showed similar repeatability and may be a rapid and convenient alternative to some existing measures. The mirroring technique provides portability and accessibility for VA charts.
机译:背景:开发了一种使用镜像技术的iPad(R)(Apple,Cupertino,CA)平板电脑的视敏度(VA)测试应用程序,该应用程序随机显示按可识别性分类的字母。这项研究的目的是评估使用该应用程序对距离VA的测量是否与视力正常的成年人VA的现有标准临床测试一致。材料和方法:使用糖尿病视网膜病变的早期治疗研究(ETDRS)图表对43名正常视力受试者进行了测试。弧(logMAR)VA结果的对数分钟数与基于iPad的应用程序的对数分钟数进行比较,该应用程序包含一个Snellen图表,一个Tumbling E图表,一个Landolt C图表以及一个由阿拉伯数字组成的VA图表。休息10分钟后,以相同的顺序对受试者进行每次测试。通过确定测试之间差异的95%协议限制+/- 1.96标准偏差来评估协议。结果:logMAR VA在ETDRS图表和iPad Snellen图表(p = 0.66)和iPad阿拉伯数字图表(p = 0.29)之间没有显着差异。 ETDRS图表的logMAR VA显着优于iPad翻滚E图表(p <0.01)或iPad Landolt C图表(p <0.01)。受试者显示了ETDRS图表(p <0.05),翻滚E图表(p = 0.03)和Landolt C图表(p = 0.001)的图表字母记忆,但未显示iPad Snellen图表(p = 0.62)和iPad阿拉伯数字图表(p = 0.12)。结论:基于iPad的VA图表应用程序显示出相似的可重复性,并且可能是某些现有度量的快速便捷的替代方法。镜像技术为VA图表提供了可移植性和可访问性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号