首页> 外文期刊>Chest: The Journal of Circulation, Respiration and Related Systems >Lessons for continuing medical education from simulation research in undergraduate and graduate medical education: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines.
【24h】

Lessons for continuing medical education from simulation research in undergraduate and graduate medical education: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines.

机译:本科生和研究生医学教育中的模拟研究提供的继续医学教育课程:持续医学教育的有效性:美国胸科医师学院循证教育指南。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Simulation technology is widely used in undergraduate and graduate medical education as well as for personnel training and evaluation in other healthcare professions. Simulation provides safe and effective opportunities for learners at all levels to practice and acquire clinical skills needed for patient care. A growing body of research evidence documents the utility of simulation technology for educating healthcare professionals. However, simulation has not been widely endorsed or used for continuing medical education (CME). METHODS: This article reviews and evaluates evidence from studies on simulation technology in undergraduate and graduate medical education and addresses its implications for CME. RESULTS: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence Report suggests that simulation training is effective, especially for psychomotor and communication skills, but that the strength of the evidence is low. In another review, the Best Evidence Medical Education collaboration supported the use of simulation technology, focusing on high-fidelity medical simulations under specific conditions. Other studies enumerate best practices that include mastery learning, deliberate practice, and recognition and attention to cultural barriers within the medical profession that present obstacles to wider use of this technology. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation technology is a powerful tool for the education of physicians and other healthcare professionals at all levels. Its educational effectiveness depends on informed use for trainees, including providing feedback, engaging learners in deliberate practice, integrating simulation into an overall curriculum, as well as on the instruction and competence of faculty in its use. Medical simulation complements, but does not replace, educational activities based on real patient-care experiences.
机译:背景:仿真技术被广泛用于本科和研究生医学教育以及其他医疗保健行业的人员培训和评估。模拟为各级学习者提供了安全有效的机会,以练习和掌握患者护理所需的临床技能。越来越多的研究证据证明了模拟技术在教育医疗保健专业人员方面的实用性。但是,模拟尚未得到广泛认可或用于继续医学教育(CME)。方法:本文回顾并评估了本科生和研究生医学教育中模拟技术研究的证据,并探讨了其对CME的影响。结果:医疗保健研究和质量证据机构的报告表明,模拟培训是有效的,尤其是对于心理运动和沟通技巧,但证据的强度很低。在另一篇评论中,最佳证据医学教育合作支持使用仿真技术,重点是在特定条件下进行高保真医学仿真。其他研究列举了最佳实践,包括精通学习,有意识的实践以及对医学界内文化障碍的认识和关注,这些障碍为广泛使用该技术带来了障碍。结论:仿真技术是对医师和其他各级医疗专业人员进行教育的有力工具。它的教育效果取决于学员的知情使用,包括提供反馈,让学习者进行有意的练习,将模拟融入整体课程中,以及教师在使用中的指导和能力。医学模拟可以补充但不能替代基于真实患者护理经验的教育活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号