...
首页> 外文期刊>The breast journal >Oncological advantages of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in treatment of early breast cancer
【24h】

Oncological advantages of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in treatment of early breast cancer

机译:肿瘤保乳术在早期乳腺癌治疗中的肿瘤学优势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The standard approach to breast-conserving surgery is wide local excision of the tumor and radiotherapy. However, a significant number of patients require further surgery to obtain oncologically clear margins, and may obtain a poor cosmetic result following adjuvant radiotherapy. Oncoplastic techniques may result in improved cosmesis, but few studies have investigated the oncological advantage of this approach. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare tumor clearance and the need for further margin excision following standard wide local excision (group A, 121 patients), and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (group B, 37 patients). These techniques included therapeutic mammoplasty, sub-axillary fat pad rotation mammoplasty, thoraco-epigastric flap, and central flap. Compared to standard surgery (group A), oncoplastic techniques (group B) can be employed for significantly larger tumors (17.6 mm versus 23.9 mm, p = 0.002). Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery results in higher mean specimen weights (58.1 g versus 231.1 g, p 0.0001), higher specimen volumes (112.3 cm3 versus 484.5 cm3, p 0.0001), and wider clear margins (6.1 mm versus 14.3 mm, p 0.0001), resulting in lower rates of further surgery (28.9% versus 5.4%, p = 0.002). There was no statistical increase in complication rates following oncoplastic surgery. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery is more successful than standard wide local excision in treating larger tumors and obtaining wider radial margins, thus reducing the need for further margin excision, which delays adjuvant therapy. There was no increase in postoperative complication rate using an oncoplastic approach. ? 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:保乳手术的标准方法是广泛的肿瘤局部切除和放射治疗。然而,大量患者需要进一步手术以获得肿瘤学上清楚的边缘,并且在辅助放疗后可能获得不良的美容效果。肿瘤整形技术可能会改善美容效果,但很少有研究调查这种方法的肿瘤学优势。这项回顾性研究的目的是比较标准的广泛局部切除术(A组,121例患者)和保留肿瘤的保乳手术(B组,37例患者)后的肿瘤清除率和进一步切缘的必要性。这些技术包括治疗性乳腺成形术,腋下脂肪垫旋转乳腺成形术,胸膜-胸膜瓣和中央瓣。与标准手术(A组)相比,可采用肿瘤整形技术(B组)治疗明显较大的肿瘤(17.6 mm对23.9 mm,p = 0.002)。保留肿瘤的保乳术会导致平均标本重量更高(58.1 g对231.1 g,p <0.0001),标本体积更大(112.3 cm3对484.5 cm3,p <0.0001)和更宽的净切缘(6.1 mm对14.3 mm,p <0.0001),导致进一步手术的发生率较低(28.9%对5.4%,p = 0.002)。肿瘤手术后的并发症发生率没有统计学上的增加。在治疗较大的肿瘤和获得更宽的放射状切缘方面,肿瘤整形保乳手术比标准的广泛局部切除术更成功,从而减少了进一步切缘的需要,这延迟了辅助治疗。使用肿瘤成形术的术后并发症发生率没有增加。 ? 2013 Wiley期刊公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号