首页> 外文期刊>The breast journal >A three-arm randomized phase II study of oral vinorelbine plus capecitabine versus oral vinorelbine and capecitabine in sequence versus docetaxel plus capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines
【24h】

A three-arm randomized phase II study of oral vinorelbine plus capecitabine versus oral vinorelbine and capecitabine in sequence versus docetaxel plus capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines

机译:对先前接受蒽环类药物治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者进行口服长春瑞滨加卡培他滨对比口服长春瑞滨和卡培他滨对比多西他赛加卡培他滨的三臂随机II期研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Owing to the increased number of patients treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy, there is a need for new effective and tolerable nonanthracycline regimens in metastatic breast cancer. Patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines in (neo)adjuvant setting were randomized to fully oral 3 weekly cycles of the combination of oral vinorelbine with capecitabine (V + C), to the same drugs alternating every three cycles (V?C), or to the combination of docetaxel and capecitabine (D + C). V was given at 80 mg/m2 (after the first cycle at 60 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 in the V + C arm and weekly in the V?C arm, C at 1,000 mg/m2 bid from days 1 to 14, and D on day 1 at 75 mg/m2. The primary end point was disease control rate (CR + PR + NC ≥ 3 months). A total of 139 patients were randomly assigned to V + C (44 patients), V?C (47 patients), and D + C (48 patients). After an independent review, the disease control rate in the intent-to-treat population in the V + C, V?C, and D + C arms [95% CI] was 70.5% [54.8-83.2], 37.0% [23.2-52.5], and 70.8% [55.9-83.1], and the median overall survival 22.2, 19.4, and 24.2 months, respectively. When taken into account the disease control rate, the alternating V?C regimen seems to be less effective compared with V + C or D + C combinations. Combinations of V + C or D + C showed similar efficacy and a different toxicity profile; V + C induced less neutropenia, infection, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue/asthenia, and alopecia, whereas D + C - less gastrointestinal toxicity. V + C combination constitutes a valuable fully oral alternative option to D + C in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines in (neo)adjuvant setting, while offering the advantages of an all-oral treatment.
机译:由于以蒽环类为基础的辅助化学疗法治疗的患者数量增加,因此需要新的有效且可耐受的转移性乳腺癌非蒽环类新方案。先前在(新)辅助环境中接受蒽环类药物治疗的HER2阴性转移性乳腺癌患者被随机分配为口服长春瑞滨与卡培他滨(V + C)组合的每周3周的完全口服治疗,每3个周期交替使用相同的药物(V ?C),或多西紫杉醇和卡培他滨(D + C)的组合。 V + C组在第1天和第8天以80 mg / m2(在第一个周期以60 mg / m2的剂量)给予V,V?C组以每周一次的剂量给予V,从第1天到第2天以1,000 mg / m2的出价出价14,D在第1天的剂量为75 mg / m2。主要终点是疾病控制率(CR + PR + NC≥3个月)。总共139例患者被随机分为V + C(44例),V?C(47例)和D + C(48例)。经过独立审查,在V + C,V?C和D + C臂[95%CI]中,意向性治疗人群的疾病控制率为70.5%[54.8-83.2],37.0%[23.2] -52.5]和70.8%[55.9-83.1],中位总生存期分别为22.2、19.4和24.2个月。考虑到疾病控制率,与V + C或D + C组合相比,交替的V?C方案似乎效果较差。 V + C或D + C的组合显示出相似的功效和不同的毒性。 V + C引起较少的中性粒细胞减少症,感染,手足综合征,疲劳/乏力和脱发,而D + C-较少的胃肠道毒性。对于先前在(新)辅助环境中用蒽环类药物治疗过的转移性乳腺癌患者,V + C组合构成了D + C有价值的完全口服替代疗法,同时具有全口服治疗的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号