...
首页> 外文期刊>The clinical journal of pain >A comparison of modality-specific somatosensory changes during menstruation in dysmenorrheic and nondysmenorrheic women.
【24h】

A comparison of modality-specific somatosensory changes during menstruation in dysmenorrheic and nondysmenorrheic women.

机译:痛经和非痛经女性月经期间特定于形式的体感变化的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate somatosensory thresholds to a multimodality stimulation regimen applied both within and outside areas of referred menstrual pain in dysmenorrheic women, over four phases of confirmed ovulatory cycles, and to compare them with thresholds in nondysmenorrheic women during menstruation. DESIGN: Twenty dysmenorrheic women with menstrual pain scoring 5.45 +/- 0.39 cm (mean +/- standard error of mean) on a visual analog scale (10 cm) participated. Fifteen nondysmenorrheic women with a menstrual pain score of 0.4 +/- 0.2 cm participated as controls. Ovulation was confirmed by an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique. Menstrual pain was described with the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Areas within menstrual pain referral were two abdominal sites and the midline of the low back, and the arm and thigh were the control areas. The pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pinch pain threshold were determined by a hand-held electronic pressure algometer, the heat pain threshold (HPT) by a contact thermode, and the tactile threshold with von Frey hairs. RESULTS: In dysmenorrheic women the McGill Pain Questionnaire showed a larger sensory and affective component of pain than the evaluative and miscellaneous groups. The HPT and PPT were lower in the menstrual phase than in the ovulatory, luteal, and premenstrual phases, both within and outside areas of referred menstrual pain (p <0.01), with a more pronounced decrease at the referral pain areas. The pinch pain threshold was lower in the menstrual phase than in the ovulatory phase (p <0.02), and the tactile threshold did not differ significantly across the menstrual phases or within any site. Dysmenorrheic women had a lower HPT at the control sites and a lower PPT at the abdomen, back, and control sites, than in those of nondysmenorrheic women in the menstrual phase. CONCLUSIONS: The results show reduced somatosensory pain thresholds during menstruation to heat and pressure stimulation, both within and outside areas of referred menstrual pain in dysmenorrheic women. Dysmenorrheic women showed a lower HPT at the control sites and a lower PPT at all the sites than those for nondysmenorrheic women in the menstrual phase. The altered somatosensory thresholds may be dependent on a spinal mechanism of central hyperexcitability, induced by recurrent moderate to severe menstrual pain.
机译:目的:目的是评估在经确认的排卵周期的四个阶段中,痛经女性在所提及的月经痛内外均采用多模式刺激方案的体感阈值,并将其与月经期间非痛经女性的阈值进行比较。设计:以视觉模拟量表(10厘米)评分的20名经痛痛经期评分为5.45 +/- 0.39厘米(均值的平均值+/-标准误差)的女性。 15名经痛评分为0.4 +/- 0.2 cm的非痛经女性作为对照组。通过酶多重免疫测定技术确认排卵。麦吉尔疼痛问卷描述了月经疼痛。经痛转诊内的区域是两个腹部部位和下背部的中线,而手臂和大腿是控制区域。压力疼痛阈值(PPT)和捏痛阈值是通过手持式电子压力计确定的,热痛阈值(HPT)是通过接触热敏电阻确定的,而触觉阈值则是冯·弗雷(von Frey)的头发。结果:痛经女性中,麦吉尔疼痛问卷显示的疼痛感官和情感成分比评估性和其他人群更大。在所提及的月经痛的内部和外部,月经期的HPT和PPT均低于排卵期,黄体期和经前期(p <0.01),而在转诊痛区的HPT和PPT降低更为明显。月经期的捏痛阈值低于排卵期(p <0.02),触觉阈值在月经期或任何部位均无显着差异。与非痛经女性在月经期相比,痛经女性在控制部位的HPT较低,在腹部,背部和控制部位的PPT较低。结论:研究结果表明,在痛经女性中,在经期疼痛的内外,经热和压力刺激的经期体感疼痛阈值降低。在月经期,痛经女性在对照部位的HPT较低,在所有部位的PPT均低于非痛经女性。体感阈值的改变可能取决于中度至重度月经反复发作引起的中枢性过度兴奋的脊柱机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号