首页> 外文期刊>The clinical journal of pain >Predictors of participation in primary care group-format back pain self-care interventions.
【24h】

Predictors of participation in primary care group-format back pain self-care interventions.

机译:参与初级保健小组形式背痛自我保健干预措施的预测指标。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explain how primary care back pain patients who volunteer for a group-format self-care intervention differ from nonvolunteers. This is relevant to the generalizability of studies that rely on volunteers as well as the characteristics of patients who do not seek out self-care interventions. SETTING: This study was conducted at a large health maintenance organization in western Washington state. PATIENTS: "Volunteers" (n = 481) were primary care back pain patients participating in randomized trials of a self-management intervention who were recruited through passive nonintensive means (a mailed invitation). "Nonvolunteers" (n = 967) consisted of a representative sample of consecutive back pain patients. We compared the baseline characteristics of these two groups. RESULTS: The relatively small percentage (8%) of primary care back pain patients who volunteered for, and ultimately participated in, group self-management classes tended to be white, older, better educated, and more likely to be retired than nonvolunteers. The two groups did not differ significantly on most clinical measures, including pain intensity and persistence. Patients experiencing the highest (and lowest) levels of pain-related activity interference were less likely to volunteer than those with moderate activity limitations, however. CONCLUSIONS: Those individuals volunteering to participate in a group-format self-care intervention in a primary care setting differed from nonvolunteers primarily on demographic measures as opposed to clinical measures. Back pain patients experiencing the highest levels of activity limitations were somewhat less likely to participate than those with moderate activity limitations. Recruitment for effective self-care interventions is an important issue in determining their impact on a population basis.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是解释自愿参加团体形式的自我护理干预的初级保健背痛患者与非自愿者之间的区别。这与依赖志愿者的研究的普遍性以及不寻求自我护理干预措施的患者的特征有关。地点:这项研究是在华盛顿州西部的一家大型健康维护组织进行的。患者:“志愿者”(n = 481)是参加自我管理干预措施随机试验的基层医疗背痛患者,这些患者是通过被动非密集方式(邮寄邀请函)招募的。 “非自愿者”(n = 967)由连续背痛患者的代表性样本组成。我们比较了这两组的基线特征。结果:自愿参加并最终参加小组自我管理课程的初级保健背痛患者的百分比相对较小(8%),与非志愿者相比,他们倾向于白人,年龄更大,教育程度更高,并且更有可能退休。两组在大多数临床指标(包括疼痛强度和持续性)上均无显着差异。但是,遭受最高水平(和最低水平)的与疼痛相关的活动干扰的患者比具有中等活动限制的患者自愿参与的可能性较小。结论:那些自愿参加基层医疗服务的团体形式自我护理干预的个体与非志愿者主要在人口统计学方法上不同,而与临床方法不同。活动受限程度最高的背痛患者比活动受限程度中等的背痛患者参与的可能性较小。招聘有效的自我保健干预措施是确定其对人群影响的重要问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号