首页> 外文期刊>The American surgeon. >Assessing Incidence and Risk Factors of Cervical Spine Injury in Blunt Trauma Patients Using theNational Trauma Data Bank
【24h】

Assessing Incidence and Risk Factors of Cervical Spine Injury in Blunt Trauma Patients Using theNational Trauma Data Bank

机译:使用国家创伤数据库评估钝性创伤患者颈椎损伤的发生率和危险因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Despite the potentially devastating impact of missed cervical spine injuries (CI), there continues to be a large disparity in how institutions attempt to make the diagnosis. To better streamline the approach among institutions, understanding incidence and risk factors across the country is paramount. We evaluated the incidence and risk factors of CI using the National Trauma Databank for 2008 and 2009. We performed a retrospective review of the National Trauma Databank for 2008 and 2009 comparing patients with and without CI. We then performed subset analysis separating injury by patients with and without fracture and ligamentous injury. There were a total of 591,138 patients included with a 6.2 per cent incidence of CI. Regression found that age, Injury Severity Score, alcohol intoxication, and specific mechanisms of motor vehicle crash (MVC), motorcycle crash (MCC), fall, pedestrian stuck, and bicycle were independent risk factors for overall injury (P < 0.0001). Patients with CI had longer intensive care unit (8.5 12.5 vs 5.1 7.7) and hospital lengths of stay (days) (9.6 14.2 vs 5.3 8.1) and higher mortality (1.2 per cent vs 0.3%), compared with those without injury (P < 0.0001). There were 33,276 patient with only fractures for an incidence of 5.6 per cent and 1875 patients with ligamentous injury. Just over 6 per cent of patients suffer some form of CI after blunt trauma with the majority being fractures. Higher Injury Severity Score and MVC were consistent risk factors in both groups. This information will assist in devising an algorithm for clearance that can be used nationally allowing for more consistency among trauma providers.
机译:尽管错过了颈椎损伤(CI)可能造成毁灭性的影响,但是机构在尝试进行诊断的方式上仍然存在巨大差异。为了更好地简化机构之间的方法,了解全国的发病率和风险因素至关重要。我们使用2008年和2009年的国家创伤数据库评估了CI的发生率和危险因素。我们对2008年和2009年的National Trauma数据库进行了回顾性审查,比较了有和没有CI的患者。然后,我们进行了子集分析,以分离有或没有骨折和韧带损伤的患者的损伤。共有591,138名患者,其中CI发生率为6.2%。回归发现,年龄,伤害严重度评分,酒精中毒以及机动车碰撞(MVC),摩托车碰撞(MCC),摔倒,行人卡死和自行车的特定机制是造成整体伤害的独立危险因素(P <0.0001)。与没有受伤的患者相比,CI患者的重症监护病房更长(8.5 12.5 vs 5.1 7.7),住院时间(天)(9.6 14.2 vs 5.3 8.1)和更高的死亡率(1.2%vs 0.3%)(P < 0.0001)。有33,276例仅骨折的患者发生率为5.6%,1875例韧带损伤的患者。仅有超过6%的患者在钝器受伤后遭受某种形式的CI,大多数为骨折。两组中较高的损伤严重度评分和MVC是一致的危险因素。该信息将有助于设计清除算法,该算法可在全国范围内使用,从而使创伤提供者之间的一致性更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号