...
首页> 外文期刊>The Biologist >A precautionary tale
【24h】

A precautionary tale

机译:一个预防性的故事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The precautionary principle can be described as an attempt to put into practice the sayings 'better safe than sorry' and 'look before you leap'.It has been the subject of debate recently due to topics such as genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and neonicotinoid pesticides. It's important technology doesn't cause harm so it seems sensible that if we don't know whether or not an action is hazardous, we should hold off on giving it the green light until we have more information. However, some feel this version of the precautionary principle has too narrow a focus, and by not considering mitigating benefit, it can put an unnecessary brake on innovation. With this inmind, the most recent Policy Lates discussion brought together a panel with experience of the principle to debate its merits and downfalls.
机译:预防原则可被描述为试图实践``好于安全而不是后悔''和``三思而后行''的说法,由于诸如转基因生物(GMO)和新烟碱之类的话题,近来它成为辩论的主题。农药。这是一项重要的技术,不会造成伤害,因此明智的做法是,如果我们不知道某项操作是否有害,则应在获得更多信息之前暂不批准。但是,有些人认为此预防原则版本的关注范围太窄,如果不考虑减少收益,则会不必要地阻碍创新。考虑到这一点,最近的“政策迟到”讨论将一个具有该原则经验的小组召集在一起,讨论了其优缺点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Biologist》 |2014年第3期|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 生物科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号