...
首页> 外文期刊>The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics >An economic model of aboriginal fire-stick farming
【24h】

An economic model of aboriginal fire-stick farming

机译:原住民火杖耕种的经济模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Australian Aborigines faced a resource management problem, which they addressed though burning regimes, referred to as fire-stick farming. While dynamic economic analysis is clearly applicable, to date there have been no attempts to use it to model burning regimes. This paper develops a delayed-response optimal-control model to describe Aboriginal fire-stick farming. The model explains a collective welfare maximizing burning regime that successfully controlled wildfires, protected the resources essential to survival, and, incidentally, produced a biodiverse landscape and limited greenhouse gas emissions. When the parameters of the model are changed to reflect the current institutional realities of reduced access to the land, and less direct dependence on it, traditional Aboriginal burning is prevented or delayed, fuel loads build up and uncontrolled fires are more likely to occur, damaging previously protected species. If Aboriginal burning is to be used to control fires successfully in a modern resource management context, it is necessary to adjust for changes in the institutional incentive structure. Payments for carbon offsets are an example of replacing lost incentives with new ones.
机译:澳大利亚原住民面临资源管理问题,他们通过燃烧制度(称为火种)解决了这一问题。尽管动态经济分析显然适用,但迄今为止,还没有尝试使用它来模拟燃烧状态。本文建立了一个延迟响应最优控制模型来描述原住民火棒耕作。该模型解释了一种集体福利最大化燃烧制度,该制度成功地控制了野火,保护了生存所必需的资源,并偶然产生了生物多样的景观和有限的温室气体排放。如果更改模型的参数以反映当前减少土地使用权以及对土地的直接依赖程度降低的当前机构现实,则可以防止或延迟传统的原住民燃烧,增加燃料负荷,更容易发生失控的大火,造成破坏先前受保护的物种。如果要在现代资源管理环境中成功地使用原住民燃烧来控制火灾,则必须根据制度激励结构的变化进行调整。碳补偿的支付就是用新的激励代替失去的激励的一个例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号