【24h】

Comparison of transmission and transflectance mode FTIR imaging of biological tissue

机译:生物组织的透射和透射反射模式FTIR成像比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

FTIR microscopy is a powerful technique which has become popular due to its ability to provide complementary information during histopathological assessment of biomedical tissue samples. Recently however, questions have been raised on the suitability of the transflection mode of operation for clinical diagnosis due to the so called Electric Field Standing Wave (EFSW) effect. In this paper we compare chemical images measured in transmission and transflection from prostate tissue obtained from five different patients, and discuss the variability of the spectra acquired with each sampling modality. We find that spectra obtained in transflection undergo a non-linear distortion, i.e. non-linear variations in absorption band strength across the spectra, and that there are significant differences in spectra measured from the same area of tissue depending on the mode of operation. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is used to highlight that poorer discrimination between benign and cancerous tissue is obtained in transflection mode. In addition we show that use of second derivatives, while qualitatively improves spectral discrimination, does not completely alleviate the underlying problem.
机译:FTIR显微镜技术是一种强大的技术,由于其在生物医学组织样品的组织病理学评估过程中提供补充信息的能力而变得流行。然而,最近由于所谓的电场驻波(EFSW)效应,已经提出了关于透射反射操作模式对临床诊断的适用性的问题。在本文中,我们比较了从五个不同患者获得的前列腺组织的透射和透射反射中测得的化学图像,并讨论了每种采样方式获得的光谱的可变性。我们发现在透射反射中获得的光谱经历了非线性失真,即整个光谱中吸收带强度的非线性变化,并且根据操作模式从相同组织区域测得的光谱存在显着差异。主成分分析(PCA)用于强调通过反射模式获得的良性和癌性组织之间的分辨力较差。此外,我们表明,使用二阶导数虽然可以从质量上改善光谱辨别力,但不能完全缓解潜在的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号