首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Gastroenterology >Esomeprazole alone compared with esomeprazole plus aspirin for the treatment of aspirin-related peptic ulcers
【24h】

Esomeprazole alone compared with esomeprazole plus aspirin for the treatment of aspirin-related peptic ulcers

机译:单独使用埃索美拉唑与埃索美拉唑加阿司匹林治疗阿司匹林相关性消化性溃疡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Aspirin-related peptic ulcers are a common disorder. However, whether or not aspirin should be continued during treatment for aspirin-related ulcers remains unclear.AIMS:To compare esomeprazole alone with esomeprazole plus aspirin in the treatment of aspirin-related peptic ulcers and to investigate the independent factors associated with the failure of ulcer healing.METHODS:From January 2008 to July 2011, patients with aspirin-related peptic ulcers were randomized to receive esomeprazole (40 mg per day) alone or esomeprazole (40 mg per day) plus aspirin (100 mg per day) for 8 weeks. The subjects with Helicobacter pylori infection were treated with standard triple therapy. Follow-up endoscopy was carried out at the end of the 8th week. The primary end point was the healing of peptic ulcers.RESULTS:In all, 178 patients (89 receiving esomeprazole alone and 89 receiving esomeprazole plus aspirin) were enrolled and underwent follow-up endoscopy. The healing rate of ulcers by modified intention-to-treat analysis was 82.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 74.2-90.8%) among patients treated with esomeprazole alone and 81.5% (95% CI, 73.0-90.0%) among patients treated with esomeprazole plus aspirin (difference, 1.0%; 95% CI, 11.2 to 12.6%). The per-protocol analysis yielded similar results (healing rate: 83.1% vs. 83.8%, respectively; difference, 0.7%; 95% CI, 11.2 to 12.6%). Multivariate analysis disclosed that use of steroids during treatment (odds ratio: 5.6; 95% CI, 1.1-27.7%) was the only independent factor associated with the failure of ulcer healing.CONCLUSIONS:The observed ulcer healing rates were comparable in the esomeprazole and esomeprazole-plus-aspirin groups, but the wide CIs do not rule out clinically meaningful differences of more than 10%.
机译:背景:阿司匹林相关的消化性溃疡是一种常见疾病。然而,尚不清楚阿司匹林相关溃疡的治疗期间是否应继续使用阿司匹林。目的:比较埃索美拉唑与埃索美拉唑加阿司匹林在治疗阿司匹林相关消化性溃疡中的作用,并调查与溃疡失败相关的独立因素方法:从2008年1月至2011年7月,将患有阿司匹林相关性消化性溃疡的患者随机分组接受艾索美拉唑(每天40 mg)或艾索美拉唑(每天40 mg)加阿司匹林(每天100 mg)治疗8周。幽门螺杆菌感染的受试者接受了标准的三联疗法治疗。在第8周结束时进行随访内窥镜检查。结果:总共纳入了178例患者(其中89例单独接受埃索美拉唑,89例接受埃索美拉唑加阿司匹林),并接受了随访内镜检查。改良意向性治疗分析的溃疡愈合率:单独使用艾美拉唑治疗的患者为82.5%(95%置信区间(CI),74.2-90.8%),其中81.5%(95%CI,73.0-90.0%)。埃索美拉唑加阿司匹林治疗的患者(差异,1.0%; 95%CI,11.2至12.6%)。按方案分析得出的结果相似(治愈率分别为83.1%和83.8%;差异为0.7%; 95%CI为11.2至12.6%)。多变量分析显示,治疗期间使用类固醇(几率:5.6; 95%CI,1.1-27.7%)是与溃疡愈合失败有关的唯一独立因素。埃索美拉唑加阿司匹林组,但广泛的CI并不排除临床上有意义的差异超过10%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号