首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Gastroenterology >Clinical and Endoscopic Characteristics do Not Reliably Differentiate PPI-Responsive Esophageal Eosinophilia and Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Patients Undergoing Upper Endoscopy: A Prospective Cohort Study
【24h】

Clinical and Endoscopic Characteristics do Not Reliably Differentiate PPI-Responsive Esophageal Eosinophilia and Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Patients Undergoing Upper Endoscopy: A Prospective Cohort Study

机译:一项前瞻性队列研究表明,上内镜检查患者的临床和内镜特征不能可靠地区分PPI反应性食管嗜酸性粒细胞增多和嗜酸性食管炎

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES:Proton-pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE) is a newly recognized entity that must be differentiated from eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Little is known about this condition. We aimed to determine the prevalence of PPI-REE and EoE in patients undergoing upper endoscopy and determine features that distinguish the two groups.METHODS:This prospective study conducted at the University of North Carolina from 2009 to 2011 enrolled consecutive adult patients undergoing outpatient upper endoscopy. Subjects had esophageal biopsies to quantify the maximum eosinophil count per high-power field (eos/hpf; hpf=0.24 mm 2). If biopsies revealed ≥15 eos/hpf, subjects were treated with twice daily PPI for 8 weeks and endoscopy was repeated. If ≥15 eos/hpf persisted despite PPI therapy, EoE was diagnosed. If there were <15 eos/hpf, PPI-REE was diagnosed. The proportion of patients in each group was calculated, and patients with EoE and PPI-REE were compared.RESULTS:Of the 223 subjects enrolled, 173 had dysphagia and 50 did not. Of those with dysphagia, 66 (38%) had ≥15 eos/hpf. After the PPI trial, 40 (23%) were confirmed to have EoE, and 24 (14%) had PPI-REE. Of those without dysphagia, 2 (4%) had ≥15 eos/hpf, and after the PPI trial, 1 (2%) had EoE. Compared with EoE, PPI-REE patients were more likely to be older and male and less likely to have typical endoscopic findings of EoE. However, none of the individual factors was independently predictive of PPI-REE status on multivariable analysis. Similarly, although some endoscopic findings were differentially distributed between PPI-REE and EoE, none were significantly associated with disease status on multivariable analysis.CONCLUSIONS:Esophageal eosinophilia is common among patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy for dysphagia. Although EoE was seen in nearly a quarter of patients with dysphagia, PPI-REE was almost as common, and accounted for over one-third of those with ≥15 eos/hpf. No clinical or endoscopic features independently distinguished PPI-REE from EoE before the PPI trial.
机译:目的:质子泵抑制剂反应性食管嗜酸性粒细胞增多症(PPI-REE)是一个新认识的实体,必须与嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎(EoE)区分开来。关于这种情况知之甚少。我们旨在确定接受上内镜检查的患者中PPI-REE和EoE的患病率,并确定区分两组的特征。方法:这项于2009年至2011年在北卡罗来纳大学进行的前瞻性研究纳入了接受门诊上内镜检查的连续成年患者。 。受试者进行了食管活检,以量化每个高倍视野的最大嗜酸性粒细胞计数(eos / hpf; hpf = 0.24 mm 2)。如果活检显示≥15 eos / hpf,则每天两次接受PPI治疗,持续8周,并重复内窥镜检查。如果尽管进行PPI治疗,仍然持续≥15 eos / hpf,则诊断为EoE。如果<15 eos / hpf,则诊断为PPI-REE。结果:在223名受试者中,有173名患有吞咽困难,而50名没有吞咽困难。吞咽困难的患者中,有66(38%)人的Eos / hpf≥15。 PPI试验后,确认有40(23%)人患有EoE,24(14%)人患有PPI-REE。在没有吞咽困难的患者中,有2(4%)的eos / hpf≥15,在PPI试验后,有1(2%)的EoE。与EoE相比,PPI-REE患者更可能是年龄较大的男性,并且不太可能具有典型的EoE内窥镜检查结果。但是,在多变量分析中,没有任何一个因素能够独立预测PPI-REE状况。同样,尽管一些内窥镜检查结果在PPI-REE和EoE之间存在差异,但在多变量分析中均未发现与疾病状况显着相关。尽管吞咽困难的患者中有将近四分之一发现了EoE,但PPI-REE几乎是常见的,占eos / hpf≥15的患者的三分之一以上。在PPI试验之前,没有任何临床或内窥镜检查特征可将PPI-REE与EoE单独区分开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号