...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Gastroenterology >The London Position Statement of the World Congress of Gastroenterology on Biological Therapy for IBD with the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization: when to start, when to stop, which drug to choose, and how to predict response?
【24h】

The London Position Statement of the World Congress of Gastroenterology on Biological Therapy for IBD with the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization: when to start, when to stop, which drug to choose, and how to predict response?

机译:与欧洲克罗恩氏和结肠炎组织就IBD进行的胃肠病学世界胃肠病学大会伦敦立场声明:何时开始,何时停止,选择哪种药物以及如何预测疗效?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The advent of biological therapy has revolutionized inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care. Nonetheless, not all patients require biological therapy. Selection of patients depends on clinical characteristics, previous response to other medical therapy, and comorbid conditions. Availability, reimbursement guidelines, and patient preferences guide the choice of first-line biological therapy for luminal Crohn's disease (CD). Infliximab (IFX) has the most extensive clinical trial data, but other biological agents (adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab pegol (CZP), and natalizumab (NAT)) appear to have similar benefits in CD. Steroid-refractory, steroid-dependent, or complex fistulizing CD are indications for starting biological therapy, after surgical drainage of any sepsis. For fistulizing CD, the efficacy of IFX for inducing fistula closure is best documented. Unique risks of NAT account for its labeling as a second-line biological agent in some countries. Patients who respond to induction therapy benefit from systematic re-treatment. The combination of IFX with azathioprine is better than monotherapy for induction of remission and mucosal healing up to 1 year in patients who are naive to both agents. Whether this applies to other agents remains unknown. IFX is also effective for treatment-refractory, moderate, or severely active ulcerative colitis. Patients who have a diminished or loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy may respond to dose adjustment of the same agent or switching to another agent. Careful consideration should be given to the reasons for loss of response. There are insufficient data to make recommendations on when to stop anti-TNF therapy. Preliminary evidence suggests that a substantial proportion of patients in clinical remission for >1 year, without signs of active inflammation can remain in remission after stopping treatment.
机译:生物疗法的出现彻底改变了炎症性肠病(IBD)的护理。但是,并非所有患者都需要生物疗法。患者的选择取决于临床特征,先前对其他药物治疗的反应以及合并症。可用性,报销指南和患者喜好可指导腔内克罗恩病(CD)一线生物疗法的选择。英夫利昔单抗(IFX)具有最广泛的临床试验数据,但其他生物制剂(阿达木单抗(ADA),赛妥珠单抗PEGGOL(CZP)和那他珠单抗(NAT))在CD中也具有相似的益处。外科手术引流任何败血症后,类固醇难治性,类固醇依赖性或复杂性瘘管CD是开始生物治疗的指征。对于CD瘘管,最好记录IFX诱导瘘管闭合的功效。 NAT的独特风险在于其在某些国家被标记为二线生物制剂。对诱导疗法有反应的患者将从系统性再治疗中受益。对于两种药物均未使用的患者,IFX与硫唑嘌呤的组合在诱导缓解和粘膜愈合长达1年方面优于单一疗法。这是否适用于其他代理仍然未知。 IFX对难治性,中度或重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎也有效。对抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)治疗反应减弱或丧失反应的患者可能会对相同药物的剂量调整或转换为其他药物有反应。应认真考虑失去回应的原因。没有足够的数据来建议何时停止抗TNF治疗。初步证据表明,在停止治疗后,相当多的临床缓解期超过1年且无活动性炎症迹象的患者可以保留在缓解期。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号