...
首页> 外文期刊>The American journal on addictions / >Gambling Severity, Impulsivity, and Psychopathology: Comparison of Treatment- and Community-Recruited Pathological Gamblers
【24h】

Gambling Severity, Impulsivity, and Psychopathology: Comparison of Treatment- and Community-Recruited Pathological Gamblers

机译:赌博严重程度,冲动性和精神病理学:比较治疗和社区招募的病理赌徒

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Objectives: Because most studies of pathological gambling gather data from participants recruited from treatment, this study compared community and treatment-enrolled pathological gamblers (PGs) with respect to demographics, gambling severity, impulsivity, and psychopathology. Methods: One hundred six PGs were recruited as part of two larger studies in Farmington, Connecticut (n= 61) and Windsor, Ontario (n= 45) using radio advertising, word of mouth, and/or newspaper ads, as well as a gambling treatment program at each location. Results: Community (n= 49) and treatment-enrolled (n= 57) PGs did not differ on age, education, gender, race, employment, or marital status. Treatment-enrolled PGs were more likely to report past year illegal behaviors, preoccupation with gambling, and higher scores on the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) Attention Impulsivity subscale. Assessment of psychopathology in the Ontario study indicated that treatment-enrolled PGs were more likely to present with Major Depressive and Dysthymic Disorders. Community-recruited PGs in the Connecticut study were overall more likely to present with any substance use disorder relative to their treatment-enrolled counterparts. Conclusions and Scientific Significance: Our findings inform intervention and research within the field of pathological gambling. Specifically, the distressing aspects of pathological gambling, such as legal issues, preoccupation with gambling, and depression, may be present more in treatment-enrolled PGs than in those recruited from the community. Such emotional disturbances should be further explored to increase motivation and treatment adherence in PGs. In addition, due to relative absence of overall differences between the groups, research findings utilizing treatment-enrolled PGs may be a good representation of both groups. (Am J Addict 2012;21:508515)
机译:背景与目的:由于大多数病理性赌博研究都是从治疗中招募的参与者收集数据,因此本研究比较了社区和接受治疗的病理性赌徒(PGs)的人口统计学,赌博严重性,冲动性和心理病理学。方法:通过广播广告,口口相传和/或报纸广告,以及在加利福尼亚州法明顿(n = 61)和安大略省温莎(n = 45)进行的两项较大研究的一部分,招募了166名PG。每个地点的赌博治疗计划。结果:社区(n = 49)和接受治疗(n = 57)的PG在年龄,教育程度,性别,种族,就业或婚姻状况方面没有差异。参加治疗的PG更有可能报告过去一年的非法行为,对赌博的关注以及在Barratt冲动量表(BIS)注意冲动子量表上的较高得分。在安大略省的研究中,对心理病理学的评估表明,接受治疗的PG更有可能出现严重的抑郁症和心律不齐。在康涅狄格州的研究中,与受治疗的同行相比,社区招募的PG总体上更容易出现任何物质使用障碍。结论和科学意义:我们的发现为病理性赌博领域的干预和研究提供了信息。具体而言,参与治疗的PG中的病理性赌博令人困扰的方面,例如法律问题,沉迷于赌博和抑郁症,可能比从社区招募的PG中所呈现的更多。应该进一步探讨这种情绪障碍,以增加PG的动机和治疗依从性。另外,由于各组之间总体差异的相对缺乏,利用治疗登记的PG的研究结果可能很好地代表了两组。 (Am J Addict 2012; 21:508515)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号