首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene >Comparative safety and immunogenicity of two yellow fever 17D vaccines (ARILVAX and YF-VAX) in a phase III multicenter, double-blind clinical trial.
【24h】

Comparative safety and immunogenicity of two yellow fever 17D vaccines (ARILVAX and YF-VAX) in a phase III multicenter, double-blind clinical trial.

机译:在III期多中心,双盲临床试验中,两种黄热病17D疫苗(ARILVAX和YF-VAX)的比较安全性和免疫原性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Yellow fever (YF) is a significant health problem in South America and Africa. Travelers to these areas require immunization. The United States, infested with Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, is at risk of introduction of this disease. There is only a single U.S. manufacturer of YF 17D vaccine, and supplies may be insufficient in an emergency. A randomized, double-blind outpatient study was conducted in 1,440 healthy individuals, half of whom received the U.S. vaccine (YF-VAX) and half the vaccine manufactured in the United Kingdom (ARILVAX). A randomly selected subset of approximately 310 individuals in each treatment group was tested for YF neutralizing antibodies 30 days after vaccination. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of individuals who developed a log neutralization index (LNI) of 0.7 or higher. Seroconversion occurred in 98.6% of individuals in the ARILVAX group and 99.3% of those in the YF-VAX group. Statistically, ARILVAX was equivalent to YF-VAX (P = .001). Both vaccines elicited mean antibody responses well above the minimal level (LNI 0.7) protective against wild-type YF virus. The mean LNI in the YF-VAX group was higher (2.21) than in the ARILVAX group (2.06; P = .010) possibly because of the higher dose contained in YF-VAX. Male gender, Caucasian race, and smoking were associated with higher antibody responses. Both vaccines were well tolerated. Overall, the treatment groups were comparable with respect to safety except that individuals in the ARILVAX group experienced significantly less edema, inflammation, and pain at the injection site than those in the YF-VAX group. No serious adverse events were attributable to either vaccine. YF-VAX participants (71.9%) experienced one or more nonserious adverse events than ARILVAX individuals (65.3%; P = .008). The difference was due to a higher rate of injection site reactions in the YF-VAX group. Mild systemic reactions (headache, myalgia, malaise, asthenia) occurred in roughly 10% to 30% of participants during the first few days after vaccination, with no significant difference across treatment groups. Adverse events were less frequent in individuals with preexisting immunity to YF, indicating a relationship to virus replication.
机译:黄热病(YF)是南美和非洲的重要健康问题。前往这些地区的旅客需要接种疫苗。在感染埃及伊蚊的美国,有引入这种疾病的危险。美国只有一家YF 17D疫苗制造商,在紧急情况下供应可能不足。在1,440名健康个体中进行了一项随机,双盲的门诊研究,其中一半接受了美国疫苗(YF-VAX),一半接受了英国生产的疫苗(ARILVAX)。疫苗接种30天后,对每个治疗组中约310个人的随机选择的亚组进行了YF中和抗体测试。主要功效终点是对数中和指数(LNI)为0.7或更高的个体比例。血清转换在ARILVAX组中占98.6%,在YF-VAX组中占99.3%。从统计上讲,ARILVAX相当于YF-VAX(P = .001)。两种疫苗均引起平均抗体反应,远高于对野生型YF病毒的最低保护水平(LNI 0.7)。 YF-VAX组的平均LNI比ARILVAX组(2.06; P = .010)高(2.21),这可能是因为YF-VAX所含剂量较高。男性,白种人,吸烟与较高的抗体应答有关。两种疫苗均耐受良好。总体而言,治疗组在安全性方面具有可比性,只是ARILVAX组的个体在注射部位的水肿,炎症和疼痛明显少于YF-VAX组。两种疫苗均无严重不良事件。与ARILVAX个人(65.3%; P = 0.008)相比,YF-VAX参与者(71.9%)经历了一种或多种非严重不良事件。差异是由于YF-VAX组的注射部位反应率更高。在接种疫苗后的最初几天中,大约10%至30%的参与者发生轻度全身反应(头痛,肌痛,不适,乏力,乏力),各治疗组之间无显着差异。先前对YF具有免疫力的个体发生不良事件的频率较低,表明与病毒复制有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号