...
首页> 外文期刊>Tenside Surfactants Detergents: Journal for Theory, Technology and Application of Surfactants >Force Measuring Methods for Determination of Surface Tension of Liquids:A Comparison
【24h】

Force Measuring Methods for Determination of Surface Tension of Liquids:A Comparison

机译:测定液体表面张力的力测量方法:比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Three methods for the determination of the surface tension of liquids based on force measurements namely,the vertical plate method of Wilhelmy,the frame method of Lenard and the ring method of du Nouy are compared and studied in respect of a common principle of correction.It is shown that these three most important force-based methods allow the determination of the surface tension under static conditions.The force components of the corresponding liquid column below the measuring wire obtained for the straight part of the withdrawal curve up to the transition in its curved part provides exact surface tension values.The experimentally accessible value of the force component describes the physical background of the measured value correction contrary to the approximate equations obtained by mathematical way.Usually the determination of surface tension of liquids is based merely at the vertical plate method on exact equations thermodynamically derived whereas in the case of the frame and ring methods correction factors in approximate equations are used.At usual application of the force-based methods under the non-static condition of the withdrawal of a liquid column,the force maximum measured at withdrawal of the measuring object (plate,frame,or ring) is the basis for the determination of surface tension.In these cases,the measured surface tension values are compensated by correction equations for the frame and ring methods which are based on an correction factor and correction tables empirically obtained.The surface tension values obtained in this usual way agree with those obtained by using the force component of the corresponding liquid column below the measuring wire for the straight part of the withdrawal curve up to the transition in its curved part.Problems arising at the force measurements with increasing thickness of the measuring wires inside and outside the rings are discussed.
机译:针对常用的校正原理,对三种基于力测量的液体表面张力的测定方法进行了比较和研究,这三种方法分别是威廉米的垂直平板法,伦纳德的框架法和杜努伊的环法。结果表明,这三种最重要的基于力的方法可以确定静态条件下的表面张力。对于抽出曲线的笔直部分直至其曲线的过渡点,获得的测量线下方相应液柱的力分量零件提供精确的表面张力值。受力分量的实验可访问值描述了测量值校正的物理背景,与通过数学方法获得的近似方程相反。通常,液体表面张力的确定仅基于垂直板法基于热力学精确方程,而对于框架和ri在近似方程式中使用ng法校正因子。在液柱抽出的非静态条件下,基于力的方法的通常应用中,在测量对象(板,框架或环)抽出时测得的最大力)是确定表面张力的基础。在这些情况下,所测量的表面张力值通过基于校正因子和凭经验获得的校正表的框架和环方法的校正方程式进行补偿。这种通常的方式与通过使用测量线下方相应液柱的力分量作为抽出曲线的笔直部分直到其弯曲部分的过渡所获得的力一致。力测量中出现的问题随着测量厚度的增加而增加讨论了环内外的金属丝。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号