...
首页> 外文期刊>Tectonophysics: International Journal of Geotectonics and the Geology and Physics of the Interior of the Earth >Present-day stress field in subduction zones: Insights from 3D viscoelastic models and data
【24h】

Present-day stress field in subduction zones: Insights from 3D viscoelastic models and data

机译:俯冲带现今的应力场:来自3D粘弹性模型和数据的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

3D viscoelastic FE models were performed to investigate the impact of geometry and kinematics on the litho spheric stress in convergent margins. Generic geometries were designed in order to resemble natural subduction. Our model predictions mirror the results of previous 2D models concerning the effects of lithosphere-mantle relative flow on stress regimes, and allow a better understanding of the lateral variability of the stress field. In particular, in both upper and lower plates, stress axes orientations depend on the adopted geometry and axes rotations occur following the trench shape. Generally stress axes are oriented perpendicular or parallel to the trench, with the exception of the slab lateral tips where rotations occur. Overall compression results in the upper plate when convergence rate is faster than mantle flow rate, suggesting a major role for convergence. In the slab, along-strike tension occurs at intermediate and deeper depths (>100 km) in case of mantle flow sustaining the sinking lithosphere and slab convex geometry facing mantle flow or in case of opposing mantle flow and slab concave geometry facing mantle flow. Along-strike compression is predicted in case of sustaining mantle flow and concave slabs or in case of opposing mantle flow and convex slabs. The slab stress field is thus controlled by the direction of impact of mantle flow onto the slab and by slab longitudinal curvature. Slab pull produces not only tension in the bending region of subducted plate but also compression where upper and lower plates are coupled. A qualitative comparison between results and data in selected subductions indicates good match for South America, Mariana and Tonga-Kermadec subductions. Discrepancies, as for Sumatra Java, emerge due to missing geometric (e.g., occurrence of fault systems and local changes in the orientation of plate boundaries) and rheological (e.g., plasticity associated with slab bending, anisotropy) complexities in the models. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:进行了3D粘弹性有限元模型,以研究几何学和运动学对收敛边界中岩石球应力的影响。设计通用几何形状以类似于自然俯冲。我们的模型预测反映了以前的2D模型有关岩石圈-地幔相对流动对应力状态的影响的结果,并可以更好地理解应力场的横向变化。特别是,在上板和下板中,应力轴的方向取决于所采用的几何形状,并且轴的旋转随沟槽形状而发生。通常,应力轴的方向垂直于或平行于沟槽,但发生旋转的平板横向尖端除外。当收敛速度快于地幔流速时,整体压缩将导致上板块的破裂,这表明收敛是主要作用。在地幔中,在地幔流维持下沉岩石圈和地幔凸几何面对地幔流的情况下,或者在地幔逆流和地幔凹几何面对地幔流的情况下,在中深度和较深深度(> 100 km)会产生沿走向的拉力。在维持地幔流和凹板的情况下,或在地幔流和凸板相反的情况下,将预测沿走向压缩。因此,板坯应力场由地幔流对板坯的冲击方向和板坯纵向曲率控制。平板拉力不仅会在俯冲板的弯曲区域产生拉力,还会在上板和下板连接处产生压缩。定性俯冲的结果与数据之间的定性比较表明,南美,马里亚纳(Mariana)和汤加-克马德克(Tonga-Kermadec)俯冲的匹配良好。就苏门答腊Java而言,差异是由于模型中缺少几何形状(例如,断层系统的出现和板边界方向的局部变化)和流变学(例如,与平板弯曲相关的可塑性,各向异性)造成的。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号