首页> 外文期刊>Plastic and reconstructive surgery >Negative-pressure wound therapy I: the paradox of negative-pressure wound therapy.
【24h】

Negative-pressure wound therapy I: the paradox of negative-pressure wound therapy.

机译:负压伤口疗法I:负压伤口疗法的悖论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Does negative-pressure wound therapy reduce or increase the pressure of wound tissues? This seemingly obvious question has never been addressed by a study on living tissues. The aim of this study was to evaluate the nature of tissue pressure changes in relation to negative-pressure wound therapy. METHODS: Three negative-pressure wound therapy dressing configurations were evaluated-circumferential, noncircumferential, and those within a cavity-on 15 human wounds, with five wounds in each category. Tissue pressure changes were recorded (using a strain gauge sensor) for each 75-mmHg increment in suction, up to -450 mmHg. In the circumferential and noncircumferential groups, tissue pressure was also measured over a 48-hour period at a set suction pressure of -125 mmHg (n = 10). RESULTS: In all three groups, mean tissue pressure increased proportionately to the amount of suction applied (p < 0.0005). Mean tissue pressure increments resulting from the circumferential dressings were significantly higher than those resulting from the noncircumferential (p < 0.0005) or cavity group (p < 0.0005); however, there was no significant difference between the latter two groups (p = 0.269). Over the 48-hour period, there was a significant mean reduction in the (increased) tissue pressure (p < 0.04 for circumferential and p < 0.0005 for noncircumferential), but in only three of 10 cases did this reduce to pressures less than those before dressing application. CONCLUSIONS: Negative-pressure wound therapy increases tissue pressure proportionately to the amount of suction, although this becomes less pronounced over 48 hours. This suggests that negative-pressure wound therapy dressings should be used with caution on tissues with compromised perfusion, particularly when they are circumferential.
机译:背景:负压伤口疗法会降低或增加伤口组织的压力吗?关于活体组织的研究从未解决过这个看似显而易见的问题。这项研究的目的是评估与负压伤口治疗有关的组织压力变化的性质。方法:对三种负压伤口疗法敷料配置进行了评估:周向,非周向以及腔内15例人类伤口,每种类别中有五处伤口。吸力每增加75mmHg,直至-450mmHg,记录组织压力变化(使用应变计传感器)。在周围和非周向组中,还在48小时内以-125 mmHg(n = 10)的设定抽吸压力测量组织压力。结果:在所有三个组中,平均组织压力均与所施加的抽吸量成正比(p <0.0005)。圆周敷料产生的平均组织压力增量明显高于非周向(p <0.0005)或腔组(p <0.0005)产生的平均组织压力增量;但是,后两组之间没有显着差异(p = 0.269)。在48小时内,组织压力(升高的)的平均压降显着降低(圆周压p <0.04,非圆周压p <0.0005),但只有10例中的3压降低到了以前的水平敷料应用。结论:负压伤口疗法会按吸力的大小成比例增加组织压力,尽管这种情况在48小时内变得不那么明显。这表明负压伤口治疗敷料应在灌注受损的组织上谨慎使用,尤其是在周围时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号