首页> 外文期刊>Plastic and reconstructive surgery >A prospective and randomized study, 'SVEA,' comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result.
【24h】

A prospective and randomized study, 'SVEA,' comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result.

机译:一项前瞻性随机研究“ SVEA”,比较了三种延迟乳房重建方法对生活质量,患者定义的生活问题区域和美容结果的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

During the last 30 years, many methods for delayed breast reconstruction have been described. There is a lack of prospective randomized trials comparing reconstruction methods. The present study (SVEA), conducted 1995 to 1996, describes the impacts of three methods: the lateral thoracodorsal flap, the latissimus dorsi flap, and the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap (TRAM), on important areas of life, patients' perception of cosmetic result, and quality of life. Questionnaires were completed before randomization and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The preoperative questionnaire concerned the impact of breast loss and expectations on reconstruction. Follow-up questionnaires dealt with satisfaction with cosmetic result and impact on important areas of life. A health-related quality-of-life questionnaire (SF-36) was completed at all points of assessment. A total of 75 of 87 randomized patients underwent breast reconstruction: 16 patients with the lateral thoracodorsal flap, 30 with the latissimus dorsi flap, and 29 with the TRAM flap. The majority were very satisfied with the cosmetic result. Most women reported improvements in important areas of life, and quality of life in terms of "social functioning" and "mental health" increased significantly after the reconstruction. The latissimus dorsi flap and TRAM flap scored significantly higher as compared with the lateral thoracodorsal flap for similarity with the contralateral breast and reduced problems in social situations. No differences between irradiated and nonirradiated patients were found. All methods were considered to produce good cosmetic results and improvements in patient-defined problem areas of life and quality of life. No negative effects were recorded. Thus, irrespective of method, breast reconstruction is a valuable tool for the mastectomized woman to cope with problems in everyday life.
机译:在过去的30年中,已经描述了许多延迟乳房重建的方法。缺乏比较重建方法的前瞻性随机试验。本研究(SVEA)于1995年至1996年进行,描述了三种方法的影响:重要的生活领域,患者的知觉方面:胸外外侧皮瓣,背阔肌皮瓣和带蒂腹直肌腹侧皮瓣(TRAM)美容效果和生活质量。问卷在随机分配之前以及术后6个月和12个月完成。术前调查表涉及乳房丢失和期望对重建的影响。后续调查表对美容效果及其对生活重要领域的影响表示满意。在所有评估点均完成了与健康有关的生活质量调查表(SF-36)。在87位随机分组的患者中,总共有75位接受了乳房再造:胸外侧外侧皮瓣16例,背阔肌皮瓣30例,TRAM皮瓣29例。大多数人对美容效果非常满意。大多数妇女报告在重要的生活领域有所改善,在重建后,“社会功能”和“心理健康”方面的生活质量大大提高。背阔肌皮瓣和TRAM皮瓣的得分明显高于胸外侧皮瓣,因为它与对侧乳房相似,并且在社交场合减少了问题。没有发现受辐照和未辐照患者之间的差异。人们认为所有方法都能产生良好的美容效果,并改善患者定义的生活问题领域和生活质量。没有记录到负面影响。因此,无论采用哪种方法,乳房再造术都是切除乳房的妇女应对日常生活中问题的宝贵工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号