...
首页> 外文期刊>Plastic and reconstructive surgery >Computer-assisted versus conventional free fibula flap technique for craniofacial reconstruction: An outcomes comparison
【24h】

Computer-assisted versus conventional free fibula flap technique for craniofacial reconstruction: An outcomes comparison

机译:计算机辅助与常规游离腓骨皮瓣技术进行颅面重建的疗效比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND:: There has been rising interest in computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing for preoperative planning and execution of osseous free flap reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between computer-assisted and conventional fibula free flap techniques for craniofacial reconstruction. METHODS:: A two-center, retrospective review was carried out on patients who underwent fibula free flap surgery for craniofacial reconstruction from 2003 to 2012. Patients were categorized by the type of reconstructive technique: conventional (between 2003 and 2009) or computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (from 2010 to 2012). Demographics, surgical factors, and perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared. RESULTS:: A total of 68 patients underwent microsurgical craniofacial reconstruction: 58 conventional and 10 computer-aided design and manufacturing fibula free flaps. By demographics, patients undergoing the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing method were significantly older and had a higher rate of radiotherapy exposure compared with conventional patients. Intraoperatively, the median number of osteotomies was significantly higher (2.0 versus 1.0, p = 0.002) and the median ischemia time was significantly shorter (120 minutes versus 170 minutes, p = 0.004) for the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technique compared with conventional techniques; operative times were shorter for patients undergoing the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technique, although this did not reach statistical significance. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were equivalent for the two groups, notably, hospital length of stay, recipient-site infection, partial and total flap loss, and rate of soft-tissue and bony tissue revisions. CONCLUSION:: Microsurgical craniofacial reconstruction using a computer-assisted fibula flap technique yielded significantly shorter ischemia times amidst a higher number of osteotomies compared with conventional techniques.
机译:背景:人们对用于骨游离皮瓣重建术前计划和执行的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造的兴趣日益浓厚。这项研究的目的是比较计算机辅助和常规腓骨游离皮瓣技术颅面重建的结果。方法:对2003年至2012年接受腓骨游离皮瓣手术进行颅面重建的患者进行了两个中心的回顾性研究。按重建技术的类型对患者进行分类:常规(2003年至2009年)或计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(从2010年到2012年)。比较了人口统计学,手术因素以及围手术期和长期预后。结果:总共68例患者接受了显微外科颅面重建:58例常规和10例计算机辅助设计和制造无腓骨皮瓣。根据人口统计学,与传统患者相比,接受计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造方法的患者年龄更大,放射治疗的暴露率更高。对于计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造技术,术中截骨术的中位数明显更高(2.0比1.0,p = 0.002),平均缺血时间明显更短(120分钟比170分钟,p = 0.004)。与传统技术相比;接受计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造技术的患者的手术时间较短,尽管这没有统计学意义。两组的围手术期和长期结局相当,尤其是住院时间,受体部位感染,部分和全部皮瓣丢失以及软组织和骨组织翻修率。结论:与传统技术相比,采用计算机辅助腓骨皮瓣技术的显微外科颅面重建术在更多的截骨术中可显着缩短缺血时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号