首页> 外文期刊>Techniques in coloproctology >The treatment of anal fistulas with biologically derived products: is innovation better than conventional surgical treatment? An update.
【24h】

The treatment of anal fistulas with biologically derived products: is innovation better than conventional surgical treatment? An update.

机译:用生物衍生产品治疗肛瘘:创新是否比常规外科手术更好?更新。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

New technical approaches involving biologically derived products have been applied in the treatment for anal fistulas in order to avoid the risk of fecal incontinence. The aim of this review was to evaluate the scientific evidence present in the literature regarding these techniques. Trials comparing surgery (fistulotomy, advancement mucosal flap closure and placement of seton) versus fibrin glue, fistula plug or acellular dermal matrix were considered. In fibrin glue versus traditional surgical treatment the healing rate was higher in the surgery group, and the recurrence rate was lower in the traditional surgery group, but these results were not statistically relevant. In acellular dermal matrix (ADM) versus traditional surgical treatment the recurrence rate of fistulas was significantly lower in the ADM group, but non-significant differences were recorded in incontinence and anal deformity. Our review shows that there are no significant advantages of the new techniques involving biologically derived products. Further randomized controlled trials are needed.
机译:为了避免粪便失禁的风险,涉及生物衍生产品的新技术方法已被用于肛瘘的治疗。本文的目的是评估文献中有关这些技术的科学证据。考虑将外科手术(Fistulotomy,粘膜瓣封闭闭合和seton放置)与纤维蛋白胶,瘘管塞或无细胞真皮基质进行比较的试验。相对于传统外科治疗,纤维蛋白胶在外科手术组中的治愈率更高,而在传统外科手术组中,复发率更低,但这些结果在统计学上并不相关。与传统的外科手术相比,脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)的瘘管复发率在ADM组显着降低,但在尿失禁和肛门畸形方面未见明显差异。我们的评论表明,涉及生物衍生产品的新技术没有显着优势。需要进一步的随机对照试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号