首页> 外文期刊>Peritoneal dialysis international: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis >A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing APD and CAPD treatment.
【24h】

A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing APD and CAPD treatment.

机译:一项前瞻性,随机,多中心研究,比较了APD和CAPD治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The goals for maintenance dialysis treatment are to improve patient survival, reduce patient morbidity, and improve patient quality of life. This is the first randomized prospective study comparing automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) treatment with respect to quality of life and clinical outcomes in relation to therapy costs. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized multicenter study. SETTING: Three Danish CAPD units. PATIENTS: Thirty-four adequately dialyzed patients with high or high-average peritoneal transport characteristics were included in the study.Twenty-five patients completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: After randomization, 17 patients were allocated to APD treatment and 17 patients to CAPD treatment for a period of 6 months. Medical and biochemical parameters were evaluated at monthly controls in the CAPD units. Quality-of-life parameters were assessed at baseline and after 6 months by the self-administered short-form SF-36 generic health survey questionnaire supplemented with disease- and treatment-specific questions. Therapy costs were compared by evaluating dialysis-related expenses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality-of-life parameters, dialysis-related complications, dialysis-related expenses. RESULTS: The quality-of-life studies showed that significantly more time for work, family, and social activities was available to patients on APD compared to those on CAPD (p < 0.001). Although the difference was not significant, there was a tendency for less physical and emotional discomfort caused by dialysis fluid in the APD group. Sleep problems, on the other hand, tended to be more marked in the APD group. Any positive effect of APD compared to CAPD on dialysis-related hospital days or complication rates could not be confirmed. With larger patient samples, it is possible, however, that a significant difference might have been achieved. The running costs for APD treatment were US
机译:目的:维持透析治疗的目标是提高患者生存率,减少患者发病率并改善患者生活质量。这是第一项随机前瞻性研究,比较了自动腹膜透析(APD)和连续非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)治疗的生活质量和与治疗费用相关的临床结局。设计:一项前瞻性随机多中心研究。地点:三个丹麦CAPD单位。患者:34例具有高或高平均腹膜转运特征的充分透析患者。25例患者完成了研究。干预措施:随机分组后,将17例患者分配为APD治疗,将17例患者分配为CAPD治疗,为期6个月。在CAPD单位的每月对照中评估医学和生化参数。生活质量参数在基线时和6个月后通过自我管理的简短SF-36通用健康调查问卷进行评估,并补充了针对疾病和治疗的特定问题。通过评估透析相关费用比较治疗费用。主要观察指标:生活质量参数,与透析相关的并发症,与透析相关的费用。结果:生活质量研究表明,与CAPD相比,APD患者有更多的工作,家庭和社交活动时间(p <0.001)。尽管差异不大,但APD组中因透析液引起的身体和情绪不适感有所减轻。另一方面,睡眠问题在APD组中往往更为明显。与透析相关的住院天数或并发症发生率,APD相对于CAPD的任何积极影响都无法确定。但是,对于较大的患者样本,可能会实现显着差异。 APD治疗的运行成本为美国

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号