首页> 外文期刊>Peritoneal dialysis international: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis >Quality of life and the relative superiority of different peritoneal dialysis modalities.
【24h】

Quality of life and the relative superiority of different peritoneal dialysis modalities.

机译:生活质量和不同腹膜透析方式的相对优势。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Quality of Life (QOL) during chronic treatment is very important. Even small improvements may be of great value. Studies regarding the relative superiority of various peritoneal dialysis (PD) modalities are most wanted. Peritoneal dialysis can be performed either manually, as in continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD), or using a mechanical device, as in automated PD (APD). Ideally a large prospective randomized study would answer the question, but such a study is very difficult to perform. In a Cochrane report (1), only three small randomized controlled trials (2,3,4) involving a total of 139 patients could be identified after an extensive literature search. No difference between CAPD and APD for clinically important outcomes was found. However, the Cochrane report concluded that, in a selected group of PD patients, such those who are younger and those who are in employment or education, APD may be considered advantageous because of its psychosocial advantages. Those outcomes were reported only in one trial.
机译:慢性治疗期间的生活质量(QOL)非常重要。即使是很小的改进也可能具有巨大的价值。最需要有关各种腹膜透析(PD)方式的相对优势的研究。腹膜透析可以手动进行,如在连续非卧床PD(CAPD)中,也可以使用机械设备进行,如在自动PD(APD)中。理想情况下,一个大型的前瞻性随机研究将回答这个问题,但是这种研究很难进行。在Cochrane报告(1)中,经过大量文献检索后,仅能鉴定出三项小型随机对照试验(2,3,4),涉及139名患者。对于临床上重要的结局,CAPD和APD之间没有差异。但是,Cochrane报告得出的结论是,在PD的某些选定患者群体中,例如年龄较小,正在接受工作或受教育的PD患者,由于其社会心理优势,APD可能被认为是有利的。这些结果仅在一项试验中报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号