...
首页> 外文期刊>Urologia internationalis >A Comparison of 120 W Laser Photoselective Vaporization versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Bladder Outlet Obstruction by Prostate Cancer
【24h】

A Comparison of 120 W Laser Photoselective Vaporization versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Bladder Outlet Obstruction by Prostate Cancer

机译:120 W激光光选择性汽化术与经尿道前列腺癌膀胱出口梗阻经尿道切除术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To compare the mid-term outcomes of photoselective vaporization of prostate (PVP) with GreenLight HPS 120 W laser and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with prostate cancer (CaP). Patients and Methods: Seventy four patients with locally advanced (T3/T4) CaP with severe LUTS or acute urinary retention (AUR) were allocated to TURP (n = 36) or PVP (n = 38). International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), maximum flow rates (Qmax) and post-void residual volumes (V-res), PSA levels, prostate volumes, complications, catheter removal and hospitalization periods were recorded. Patients were reassessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: The catheter removal time was significantly longer in the TURP group (3.8 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.7 days, p = 0.02), whereas failure of initial voiding trial was higher in PVP (2.7 vs. 13.1%, p = 0.01). No significant difference in IPSS, Qmax and V-res values was observed within the follow-up period between two groups. A significant difference in urethral stricture rate (8.3 vs. 0%), catheter removal time (3.8 +/- 11 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.7 days) and hospital stay ( 2.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.5 days) was observed in favor of PVP. Conclusions: Palliative PVP is very safe and effective by means of symptomatic relief in patients with locally advanced CaP. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:目的:比较GreenLight HPS 120 W激光对前列腺进行光选择性汽化(PVP)和经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)治疗阻塞性前列腺癌(CaP)的下尿路症状(LUTS)的中期结果。患者和方法:将74例局部晚期(T3 / T4)CaP伴严重LUTS或急性尿retention留(AUR)的患者分配到TURP(n = 36)或PVP(n = 38)。记录国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS),最大流量(Qmax)和排尿后残余量(V-res),PSA水平,前列腺体积,并发症,导管拔除和住院时间。在3、6和12个月时对患者进行重新评估。结果:在TURP组中,导管拔除时间明显更长(3.8 +/- 1.1天与1.2 +/- 0.7天,p = 0.02),而初始排尿试验的失败在PVP中更高(2.7 vs. 13.1%, p = 0.01)。在两组之间的随访期内,未观察到IPSS,Qmax和V-res值的显着差异。尿道狭窄率(8.3%vs. 0%),导管移除时间(3.8 +/- 11 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.7天)和住院时间(2.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.5天)有显着差异)被认为有利于PVP。结论:对于局部晚期CaP患者,通过症状缓解,姑息性PVP是非常安全和有效的。 (C)2015 S.Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号