首页> 外文期刊>Ursus: an official publication of the International Association for Bear Research and Management >Supplemental feeding with carrion is not reducing brown bear depredations on sheep in Slovenia
【24h】

Supplemental feeding with carrion is not reducing brown bear depredations on sheep in Slovenia

机译:斯洛文尼亚补充吃腐肉并不能减少棕熊对绵羊的掠夺

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Supplemental feeding is often believed to be a successful tool for reducing human– bear (Ursus arctos) conflicts, especially in Europe. However, effectiveness of this measure is poorly understood and there is growing concern for potential negative side-effects. This is particularly true for supplemental feeding using livestock carrion. Carrion feeding is considered especially effective in reducing livestock depredations by diverting bears from pastures and meeting their protein needs. In Slovenia, year-round supplementary feeding of bears with livestock carrion and corn was intensive and in some areas practiced for over 100 years. However, in 2004 the use of livestock carrion was banned in accordance with European Union regulations. This provided an opportunity to study the effects of carrion feeding on livestock depredations by bears. We used sheep as they represented 97% of all depredation events by brown bears in Slovenia. We analyzed whether bears selectively used carrion feeding stations over corn feeding stations (i.e., indicating that carrion might be more effective in diverting bears from sheep pastures) during 1994–2011, and compared the annual frequency and seasonal distribution of sheep depredations 5 years before and after the ban on livestock carrion feeding during 1999–2009. We found no support that bears selected carrion feeding sites over feeding sites with corn. When controlled for changes in bear and sheep numbers, there was no indication that the ban on carrion feeding increased sheep depredations. Moreover, complementary data indicated that natural protein sources were considerably more important than livestock carrion and that use of carrion peaked in spring, when sheep are rarely outdoors and thus unavailable for depredation. Because of the observed lack of effectiveness, high costs, and potential negative side-effects, we discourage supplemental feeding with livestock carrion to reduce livestock depredations.
机译:人们通常认为补充喂养是减少人熊(Ursus arctos)冲突的成功工具,尤其是在欧洲。但是,对该措施的有效性了解甚少,并且人们对潜在的负面副作用越来越关注。对于使用牲畜腐肉进行补充喂养尤其如此。通过从牧场上转移熊并满足其蛋白质需求,腐肉喂养被认为对减少牲畜的掠夺特别有效。在斯洛文尼亚,全年都在密集地给熊补充家畜腐肉和玉米,在某些地区实行了100多年。但是,根据欧盟法规,2004年禁止使用牲畜腐肉。这为研究腐肉喂养对熊的家畜掠食的影响提供了机会。我们使用绵羊是因为它们占斯洛文尼亚棕熊所有掠夺事件的97%。我们分析了1994-2011年期间熊是否在玉米饲喂站上选择性地使用了腐肉喂养站(即,表明腐肉可能更有效地从绵羊牧场中转移了熊),并比较了5年和之前5年的绵羊掠食的年频率和季节分布在1999-2009年禁止饲养牲畜腐肉后。我们发现没有任何支持可以选择玉米作为腐肉的饲喂场所。当控制熊和绵羊数量的变化时,没有迹象表明禁止腐肉喂养会增加绵羊的掠食性。此外,补充数据表明,天然蛋白质来源比牲畜腐肉重要得多,并且腐肉的使用在春季达到高峰,那时绵羊很少在户外活动,因此无法被淘汰。由于观察到缺乏有效性,高成本以及潜在的负面影响,因此我们不建议使用补充牲畜腐肉的饲料来减少牲畜的掠食。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号