首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Intracavernous alprostadil alfadex is more efficacious, better tolerated, and preferred over intraurethral alprostadil plus optional actis: a comparative, randomized, crossover, multicenter study.
【24h】

Intracavernous alprostadil alfadex is more efficacious, better tolerated, and preferred over intraurethral alprostadil plus optional actis: a comparative, randomized, crossover, multicenter study.

机译:海绵体内的前列地尔afadex比尿道内的前列地尔再加上可选的actis更有效,耐受性更好,并且是首选的:一项比较,随机,交叉,多中心研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, safety, and patient preference of intracavernously administered alprostadil alfadex and intraurethrally administered alprostadil. METHODS: A crossover, randomized, open-label multicenter study of 111 patients with erectile dysfunction of at least 6 months' duration compared the efficacy, safety, and patient preference of intracavernosal alprostadil (EDEX/Viridal) with MUSE plus optional ACTIS. All patients underwent an in-office dose titration with either drug before undertaking an at-home treatment phase. The most frequently used doses during the at-home phase were 40 microg (44.1% of men) and 1000 microg (86.8% of men) for EDEX and MUSE, respectively; the mean doses were 26.1 microg and 922.5 microg for EDEX and MUSE, respectively. RESULTS: More EDEX than MUSE administrations resulted in an erection sufficient for sexual intercourse (82.5% versus 53.0%); significantly more patients using EDEX achieved at least one erection sufficient for sexual intercourse (92.6% versus 61.8%; P <0.0001); and EDEX use resulted in a significantly greater percentage of patients attaining at least 75% of erections sufficient for sexual intercourse (75% versus 36.8%; P <0.0001). Penile pain was the most common side effect for both medications: 20.0% versus 30.5% (in-office) and 33.8% versus 25.0% (at-home) for EDEX and MUSE, respectively. Similar numbers of adverse events were reported with either treatment during the at-home phase. Patient and partner satisfaction was greater with EDEX, and more patients preferred this therapy, choosing to continue it during a patient preference period at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Since intracavernous injection therapy was more efficacious, better tolerated, and preferred by the patients and their partners, it should be offered as the first-choice treatment if oral therapy fails or is contraindicated.
机译:目的:比较腔内施用前列地尔阿法地昔和尿道内施用前列地尔的疗效,安全性和患者偏好。方法:一项对111名勃起功能障碍至少持续6个月的患者进行的交叉,随机,开放标签的多中心研究,比较了腔腔内前列地尔(EDEX / Viridal)与MUSE加可选的ACTIS的疗效,安全性和患者偏好。在进行在家治疗之前,所有患者均接受了两种药物的办公室剂量滴定。 EDEX和MUSE在家阶段最常用的剂量分别为40微克(占男性的44.1%)和1000微克(占男性的86.8%)。 EDEX和MUSE的平均剂量分别为26.1微克和922.5微克。结果:EDEX高于MUSE给药,导致勃起足以进行性交(82.5%对53.0%);显着更多的使用EDEX的患者至少勃起一次足以进行性交(92.6%比61.8%; P <0.0001); EDEX的使用导致显着更多的患者达到至少75%的勃起足以进行性交(75%比36.8%; P <0.0001)。阴茎疼痛是两种药物最常见的副作用:EDEX和MUSE分别为20.0%对30.5%(办公室)和33.8%对25.0%(在家)。在家庭阶段,两种治疗方法均报告了相似数量的不良事件。 EDEX使患者和伴侣的满意度更高,并且更多的患者更喜欢这种疗法,并选择在研究结束时的患者偏爱期间继续使用该疗法。结论:由于海绵内注射疗法更有效,耐受性更好,并且受到患者及其伴侣的青睐,因此,如果口服疗法失败或禁忌,应将其作为首选疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号