首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Can the outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate be predicted preoperatively?
【24h】

Can the outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate be predicted preoperatively?

机译:可以在术前预测前列腺经尿道切除术的结果吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To establish a formula for predicting the outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate using noninvasive parameters of preoperative evaluation. METHODS: The data of 54 men with a mean age of 57 years (range 43 to 78) were retrospectively analyzed. The International Prostate Symptom Score, quality-of-life score of the International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire, maximal flow rate (Qmax) recorded during uroflowmetry, age, prostate volume calculated by transrectal ultrasonography, postvoid residual urine volume, and results of pressure-flow studies were evaluated to find a formula that would predict the outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate. The patients were evaluated by uroflowmetry, postvoid residual urine volume determination, and International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire at 3 months postoperatively. Four different success criteria were investigated with the calculated equations. RESULTS: According to the discriminant analysis, two new scores were calculated as S(1) = (0.169 x age) - (0.0075 x Qmax) and S2 = (0.168 x age) - (0.095 x Qmax) - (0.007 x detrusor pressure at Qmax). For the four success criteria, the optimal cutoff, obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curves of S(1) and S(2), was 8.83 and 9.21, respectively. A statistically significant difference was not found between S1 and S2. The S1 formula had a sensitivity between 71.8% and 85.2%, specificity between 71.4% and 86.7%, and positive predictive value between 72.2% and 92.9% for the four different criteria using two simple variables (Qmax of uroflowmetry and age). CONCLUSIONS: Because urodynamic parameters did not add benefit to the formula consisting of age and Qmax of uroflowmetry with considerable sensitivity and specificity, performing urodynamic studies might not be useful for predicting the outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate.
机译:目的:使用术前评估的非侵入性参数,建立预测经尿道前列腺电切术结果的公式。方法:回顾性分析54例平均年龄为57岁(43至78岁)的男性的数据。国际前列腺症状评分,国际前列腺症状评分问卷的生活质量评分,尿流测定法中记录的最大流量(Qmax),年龄,经直肠超声检查得出的前列腺体积,术后无残余尿量和压力流结果对研究进行了评估,以找到可以预测前列腺经尿道切除术结果的公式。术后3个月通过尿流法,无残留尿量测定和国际前列腺症状评分问卷对患者进行评估。通过计算公式研究了四个不同的成功标准。结果:根据判别分析,计算出两个新分数,即S(1)=(0.169 x年龄)-(0.0075 x Qmax)和S2 =(0.168 x年龄)-(0.095 x Qmax)-(0.007 x逼尿肌压力在Qmax)。对于这四个成功标准,从S(1)和S(2)的接收器工作特性曲线获得的最佳截止分别为8.83和9.21。在S1和S2之间未发现统计学上的显着差异。使用两个简单变量(尿流率的Qmax和年龄)对四个不同的标准,S1公式的灵敏度在71.8%至85.2%之间,特异性在71.4%至86.7%之间,阳性预测值在72.2%至92.9%之间。结论:由于尿流动力学参数并没有增加尿道流量计的年龄和Qmax组成的公式的灵敏度和特异性,因此进行尿流动力学研究可能对预测经尿道前列腺电切术的结果没有帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号